My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9392
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:36:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9392
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and S. Stewart.
Title
A Four Corners Regional Focus on the Economic Impact of Critical Habitat Designation for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Albuquerque.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
sectors. Sectors 1 and 2 are linked both forward and backward. That is, sector 1 provides inputs <br />to sector 2 and vice versa. Thus, a direct impact to sector 2 finds its way to sector 1 via two <br />channels. There is a flow of 200 dollars from sector 2 to sector 1 and 100 dollars to sector 2. <br />The table also reports other factors concerning the activity of the economy. For example, sector <br />2 generates a gross output of 1900 dollars. Households consume 300 dollars of sector 2's output <br />and the remaining final demand categories (investment, government, and net exports) take up <br />1300 dollars. Total payments equal gross output for each sector. Thus, the economy is in <br />balance. Labor earns 300 dollars in sector 1 and 500 dollars in sector 2. <br />Thus, a key property of I-O models is that they capture the linkages that exist in an economy. <br />An external shock to a particular sector, due to actions taken on behalf of the endangered fishes, <br />will be reflected throughout the economy. The I-O model allows identification of consequences <br />for each sector of the economy as well as the entire regional economy. These consequences are <br />measured as changes in output and employment. For example, if the gross output of sector 2 <br />increases due to an exogenous action, this leads to an increase in the output of sector 1 and <br />increases in the payments to labor.4 <br />The input-output method enjoys considerable support for its continued use in regional economic <br />analysis. As Dervis, De Melo, and Robinson [ 1982] have noted, <br />"The core around which all such applied models are built is the input-output <br />model pioneered by Leontief. The essence ofinput-output analysis is that it <br />captures the crucial element of the interrelatedness of production arising through <br />the flow of intermediate goods among sectors.... the simple input-output model . <br />represents a powerful tool for applied general equilibrium analysis." [p.6] <br />Indeed, I-O analysis continues to enjoy widespread use by such organizations as the U.S. Forest <br />Service, and many projects in developing countries have been evaluated by the World Bank <br />using I-O models. <br />°An exogenous action is an action that occurs outside of the economy, but which may have effects on <br />elements within the economy, such as a regulation imposed by a federal or state agency. An endogenous action is <br />an action that is initiated within the system. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.