My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7945
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7945
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:33:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7945
Author
Bovee, K. D. and T. Cochnauer.
Title
Development And Evaluation Of Weighted Criteria Probability-Of-Use Curves For Instream Flow Assessments
USFW Year
1977.
USFW - Doc Type
Fisheries, Instream Flow Information Paper No. 3.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Most present-day methods of assessing flow address only one, or <br />occasionally two, of the above species classes. Frequently, a par- <br />ticular life history stage, or a certain time period is singled out as <br />being critical for the continued well-being of a fish population. A <br />flow recommendation for a relatively long time period may be based on an <br />a riori assumption about critical conditions for a small and rather <br />definite time period. For example, spawning success is commonly con- <br />sidered a critical factor in the maintenance of a fish population, but <br />habitat evaluations for fry and juvenile-fish are almost universally <br />neglected. <br />It must be recognized that regardless of the methods or the bio- <br />logical criteria employed, there are always assumptions of which the <br />biologist must be aware. Some assumptions are expressed, while others <br />are implied, and each exerts an influence on the conduct of the study <br />and its eventual defense. Value judgements which should be made during <br />any streamflow assessment involves these assumptions; i.e., whether or <br />not the assumptions appear logical and are acceptable for the case at <br />hand, and the ability of the field practitioner to logically defend <br />the assumptions. <br />The types of criteria concerned herein are termed elective criter- <br />ia. The expressed assumption is that the distribution and abundance <br />of any species is not primarily influenced by any single parameter of <br />streamflow, but related by varying degrees to all hydraulic parameters. <br />It is further assumed that a species will-elect to leave an area when <br />streamflow conditions become unfavorable, and will generally not vol- <br />untarily remain in the area until conditions become lethal. <br />Probability curves are based on the assumption that individuals of <br />a species will tend to select the most favorable conditions in a stream, <br />but will also use less favorable conditions within a defined range, <br />with the probability of use decreasing as conditions approach the end <br />points of the total range (Figure 1). These curves are integral to the <br />use of the IFG Incremental Instream Flow Method, which will be de- <br />scribed under a separate title, available from the Cooperative In- <br />stream Flow Service Group. Instream Flow Information Paper 8 (in <br />preparation). <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.