3504 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

to those of the razorback stockings in regard to predation can probably be expected with squawfish stocked in the Salt and Verde rivers. Dispersal of Colorado squawfish may be significantly different than observed for razorback suckers, however. Adult squawfish are known to move great distances (~lU0 km), presumably to spawn (Tyus et al. 1981, Tyus et al. 1985, Miller et al. 1984, Tyus 1985). Less is known about razorback sucker movements although spawning migrations have been observed (Jordan 1891, Hubbs and Miller 1953, Ellison 1980). Observations by DNFH personnel of both species in raceways and ponds do indicate a difference. squawfish are active and move throughout accessible areas while razorback suckers remain in localized areas, generally near the bottom. Studies to identify short term dispersal of stocked fingerling squawfish in the Verde River are planned for fall 1986 and should answer questions regarding post-stocking movements as well as predation by introduced predators. Collections of adults up to four months after stocking indicate larger fish do not appear to move but this may be different for stocked fingerlings. Homing behavior for Colorado squawfish has been reported by Tyus (1985), based on radiotelemetry data on extensive movements during late spring-summer, when squawfish spawning activities begin (Vanicek and Kramer 1969, Holden and Stalnaker 1975,~Holden and Wick 1982). However, data by Tyus et al. (1981) and Miller et al. (1984) indicate that most radiot~lemetered squawfish either moved little or remained stationary. Of 6 fish