My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3504
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
3504
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:31:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
3504
Author
Brooks, J. E.
Title
Reintroduction and Monitoring of Colorado Squawfish (
USFW Year
1986.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
reservoirs in the Gila River basin afford native fishes a <br />stronghold against the encroachment of development and resulting <br />biotic communities. It has been demonstrated that maintenance of <br />natural riverine conditions, especially including flow regimes, <br />is beneficial to native fish communities and detrimental to <br />introduced species (Minckley and Meffe 1986). The periodic <br />elimination or at least reduction of introduced fishes from <br />reaches of streams and rivers allows native fishes opportunities <br />to reinvade areas formerly unsuitable due to predation and/or <br />competition. There is no biological reason to believe that <br />reintroduced squawfish would react any differently than other <br />native fishes in Arizona waters. <br />Recent efforts to reintroduce razorback suckers in historic <br />mainstream and tributary habitats of the Gila River Basin, <br />Arizona have identified several factors that may affect survival <br />of stocked squawfish (Brooks 1986). Downstream dispersal of <br />stocked razorback suckers and subsequent predation by flathead <br />(Pylodictis olivaris) and channel (Ictalurus punctatus) catfishes <br />have resulted in substantial changes in the stocking protocol. <br />To avoid stranding of stocked fish by irrigation diversion <br />structures, downstream stocking locations have been eliminated. <br />Upstream planting in tributaries not only avoids this factor but <br />partially offsets that of predation as well. Tributaries are <br />generally dominated by native species, have few introduced <br />predators and in general are more natural ecologically (Minckley <br />and Clarkson 1979, Propst et al. 1985). Zn addition, stocking <br />larger fish may reduce the level of predation. Results similar <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.