Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />10 <br />FIGURE 3 50th Percentile Elevations from Januar 2002 to December 2011 <br /> <br />Flaming Gorge Elevation <br />50th Percentile <br /> <br />6040 <br /> <br />6030 <br /> <br /> <br />-::;- 6020 .. ..' <br />~ <br />c <br />.2 . . <br /><::i <br />> .. , <br />.., .. <br />G:i 60 I 0 <br /> All 50%i1e <br /> 6000 All - I 500/0i Ie <br /> No Action 500/0ile <br /> All Trace 16 <br /> 5990 <br /> 01-2002 01-2004 01-2006 01-2008 01-2010 01-2012 <br /> Year <br /> <br />Figure 4 shows another example of how achieving the 18,600 cfs objective had a <br />significant impact to the reservoir elevation of the Action(ALL) results. In this trace (trace 16) <br />there are 5 years where the Yampa River flows during the spring were high and triggered the <br />Action(ALL) ruleset to attempt to achieve the 18,600 cfs objective. These years were 2002, <br />2003,2004,2008, and 2010. Because of the increased peak releases that occurred in these years <br />for the Action(ALL) model run, the reservoir elevation remained substantially lower than the <br />Action(ALL-l) model run for most of the 10 year period shown in the figure. The elevation fully <br />recovered in 2009 by was then depressed in 2010 when the Action(ALL) ruleset was again <br />triggered to achieve the 18,600 cfs objective. <br />