My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8057
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8057
Author
Bennett, J. R., D. A. Krieger, T. P. Nesler, L. E. Harris and R. B. Nehring.
Title
An Assessment Of Fishery Management And Fish Production Alternatives To Reduce The Impact Of Whirling Disease In Colorado.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In the short term, recommendations include trading fish with the WD- federal fish hatchery <br />at Hotchkiss, developing an increased water supply and production capacity at the Buena Vista <br />Correctional Facility, increasing production at the Pitkin hatchery, leasing or purchasing WD-, <br />private hatchery(s), and purchasing WD- trout from the private sector. Long-term alternatives (in <br />addition to the short-term) include acquiring new (undeveloped) water sources and cleaning up <br />and/or modifying existing facilities. However, before any expensive options are finalized, a <br />thorough cost/benefit analysis (including risk assessment) should be performed by a consulting <br />firm specializing in hatchery system analysis. <br />Alternatives <br />Twenty-two alternatives were identified from the assessment of the various issues. From <br />this list, seven alternatives were identified as "assumed," meaning that, while they were considered <br />appropriate by the Team, they were either already being implemented or certain to be <br />implemented. These "assumed alternatives" are: <br />* Implement the WD Policy (D-9, May 1996) with respect to protection/stocking restrictions <br />in native cutthroat trout and wild trout waters. <br />* Implement recovery, conservation, and management plans to expand the range of three <br />native cutthroat trout, and restore them to a viable biological status. <br />* Use native cutthroat in their endemic drainages as the primary species for management in <br />headwater drainages, providing catch-and-release and limited-harvest fishing opportunities. <br />* Investigate options for reducing the negative impacts of WD to stocked fish, and evaluate <br />other species and strains of salmonids for resistance to WD; initiate research to determine <br />the density, periodicity, and seasonality of waterborne spore production in infested waters. <br />* Conduct a research project to determine whether the continued stocking of trout from WD+ <br />units into WD+ habitats increases or maintains WD spore levels above that produced by the <br />alternative tubifex worm host. <br />* Buy WD- trout from the private sector. <br />* Trade for WD- trout from federal hatcheries. <br />Seven additional preferred alternatives were recommended: <br />Balance the use of WD+ and WD- trout to protect resources while creating and directing <br />fishing recreation. <br />Vlll
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.