My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8057
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8057
Author
Bennett, J. R., D. A. Krieger, T. P. Nesler, L. E. Harris and R. B. Nehring.
Title
An Assessment Of Fishery Management And Fish Production Alternatives To Reduce The Impact Of Whirling Disease In Colorado.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The habitat occupied by native cutthroat trout or officially designated as Gold Medal or <br />Wild Trout fisheries is limited. Much of the current and potential stream and lake habitat for <br />native cutthroats occurs in headwater drainages, and the use of native cutthroats as the primary <br />trout species for management in these headwater drainages appears feasible from a conservation <br />perspective. However, even with the expansion of native cutthroat waters to full potential, the <br />resource base for these species would represent only 10% of the coldwater stream miles and 1% <br />of the coldwater lake surface area available. Fisheries for these species should focus on catch- <br />and-release and limited-harvest regulations. <br />Threats to native cutthroat from hybridization with nonnative salmonids, overharvesting <br />from angling, and degradation of habitat can be dealt with using known fish management <br />strategies, legal protection of instream flows, and water quality regulations. Protection from WD <br />stocking has been provided through DOW policy, which defines native cutthroat habitat and high- <br />quality wild trout fisheries, and through the immediate application of stocking restrictions to <br />protect populations from exposure to the parasite. Continued establishment of new populations <br />of native cutthroat trout provides insurance against potential losses to WD. <br />Recreation <br />Fishery resources in Colorado are characterized by their management type (using the <br />DOW's Categorization System) into Intensive Use (catchable trout stocking), Optimum Use (no <br />stocking, or cold- and warmwater fry, fingerling, or subcatchable hatchery fish), and Special Use <br />(little or no stocking). Fishing recreation days, fish catch, and fish stocking requirements <br />associated with each category were estimated for the base year 1992. More recently, trout <br />stocking has been changed to prevent the spread of the WD parasite into protected habitats. As a <br />result, estimated fishing recreation days and their statewide distribution have likely been <br />significantly altered. This change, along with the decision to reduce WD+ catchable trout <br />stocking by 1.3 million fish in 1997, could further reduce recreation days on the west slope by <br />500,000 recreation days as compared with 1992, while east slope recreation days could decline to <br />1992 levels. Because the state is perilously close to losing negative WD status on its remaining <br />fry and fingerling production units, serious losses of fishing recreation could also occur in habitats <br />managed for Optimum Use. <br />A number of options could be considered to mitigate the loss of recreation days resulting <br />from reductions in WD+ stocking. Balancing the stocking of WD- and WD+ trout in 1997 can <br />provide some short-term, but limited, relief to fishing recreation losses that the state is now <br />experiencing. Increasing recreation in warmwater fisheries holds some promise through the <br />acquisition of new access, improvement of angler facilities, enhancement of habitat at existing <br />lakes, and an increase in the stocking levels of WD+ catchable trout in nontraditional warmwater <br />habitats. Emphasizing wild trout management in Coldwater lakes may have only limited potential <br />because of the near total dependency on hatchery-reared trout to sustain fishing recreation in <br />those habitats. On the other hand, there is some potential to switch to a greater reliance on wild <br />trout management (including native cutthroats). The tradeoff is a loss of recreation days or some <br />vi
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.