My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8057
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8057
Author
Bennett, J. R., D. A. Krieger, T. P. Nesler, L. E. Harris and R. B. Nehring.
Title
An Assessment Of Fishery Management And Fish Production Alternatives To Reduce The Impact Of Whirling Disease In Colorado.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Vim. ALTERNATIVES <br />Assumed Alternatives <br />Several alternatives from the preceding list were thought to be "givens," i.e., either already very <br />likely to occur or so obvious that little more than a reference would be needed to underscore their <br />importance. They are: <br />Alternative 1: Implement the WD Policy with respect to protection/stocking restrictions in <br />native cutthroat trout and wild trout waters. <br />Alternative 2: Implement recovery, conservation and management plans to expand the <br />range of three native cutthroat trout, and restore them to a viable biological status. <br />Alternative 3: Use native cutthroat in their respective drainages as the primary species for <br />management in headwater drainages to provide catch-and-release and limited-harvest <br />fishing opportunities. <br />Alternative 4: Initiate research to determine the density, periodicity, and seasonality of <br />waterborne spore production in infested waters to reduce the negative impacts to <br />stocked fish, and evaluate other species and strains of salmonids for resistance to WD. <br />Alternative 6: Conduct a research project to answer the question of whether the continued <br />stocking of trout from WD+ units into WD+ habitats increases or maintains WD <br />spore levels above that produced by the alternative tubifex worm host. <br />Alternative 19: Buy WD- trout from the private sector. <br />Because of the time that may be involved to research appropriate methodology and the <br />actual elimination of WD from infected units, a more immediate solution for the lack of <br />WD- fish would be to purchase WD- trout from private units. The cost of this option, as <br />well as the untested mechanics of meeting a specific and demanding stocking regime by <br />private vendors, this alternative should only be considered for the most urgent "damage <br />control" situations. The most rigorous testing should be given to the purchased fish (equal <br />to that at state units) to assure high quality and disease-free status. <br />Alternative 21: Trade for WD- trout from federal hatcheries. <br />Another potential strategy for increasing the supply of WD- trout may be trading lightly <br />infected WD+ trout from state units for WD- trout from the Hotchkiss National Fish <br />Hatchery. For example, a swap might involve the stocking of lightly infected WD+ trout <br />into Blue Mesa Reservoir (a positive habitat) and diverting the Hotchkiss WD- fish <br />scheduled for Blue Mesa to waters limited to WD- stocking. <br />50
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.