Laserfiche WebLink
Vim. ALTERNATIVES <br />Assumed Alternatives <br />Several alternatives from the preceding list were thought to be "givens," i.e., either already very <br />likely to occur or so obvious that little more than a reference would be needed to underscore their <br />importance. They are: <br />Alternative 1: Implement the WD Policy with respect to protection/stocking restrictions in <br />native cutthroat trout and wild trout waters. <br />Alternative 2: Implement recovery, conservation and management plans to expand the <br />range of three native cutthroat trout, and restore them to a viable biological status. <br />Alternative 3: Use native cutthroat in their respective drainages as the primary species for <br />management in headwater drainages to provide catch-and-release and limited-harvest <br />fishing opportunities. <br />Alternative 4: Initiate research to determine the density, periodicity, and seasonality of <br />waterborne spore production in infested waters to reduce the negative impacts to <br />stocked fish, and evaluate other species and strains of salmonids for resistance to WD. <br />Alternative 6: Conduct a research project to answer the question of whether the continued <br />stocking of trout from WD+ units into WD+ habitats increases or maintains WD <br />spore levels above that produced by the alternative tubifex worm host. <br />Alternative 19: Buy WD- trout from the private sector. <br />Because of the time that may be involved to research appropriate methodology and the <br />actual elimination of WD from infected units, a more immediate solution for the lack of <br />WD- fish would be to purchase WD- trout from private units. The cost of this option, as <br />well as the untested mechanics of meeting a specific and demanding stocking regime by <br />private vendors, this alternative should only be considered for the most urgent "damage <br />control" situations. The most rigorous testing should be given to the purchased fish (equal <br />to that at state units) to assure high quality and disease-free status. <br />Alternative 21: Trade for WD- trout from federal hatcheries. <br />Another potential strategy for increasing the supply of WD- trout may be trading lightly <br />infected WD+ trout from state units for WD- trout from the Hotchkiss National Fish <br />Hatchery. For example, a swap might involve the stocking of lightly infected WD+ trout <br />into Blue Mesa Reservoir (a positive habitat) and diverting the Hotchkiss WD- fish <br />scheduled for Blue Mesa to waters limited to WD- stocking. <br />50