Laserfiche WebLink
Demand <br />12. Standardize key terminology and processes (e.g., cost of producing various sizes and <br />species of fish, data about the existing aquatic habitat base, angler use, etc.) to minimize <br />confusion about key data and how they were derived and used. <br />13. Undertake an economics-based study that examines the cost, benefits, and anglers' <br />willingness to pay for hatchery-reared fish in Colorado. This should also incorporate results <br />to enable an understanding of "angler satisfaction" and the estimation of angler success and <br />demand by category. The study should be done on a broad scale so that the results can be <br />applied to the entire hatchery system. <br />14. Implement user pay mechanisms to determine the demand for catchable trout and to enable <br />DOW to index hatchery production. <br />Hatcheries <br />15. Initiate research to determine if UV light, sand filtration, or other screening materials <br />provide a viable methodology for eliminating WD spores from hatchery supply waters. <br />16. Eliminate all production of WD+ trout from state hatcheries and accept the associated loss <br />of stocking and recreation days. <br />17. Reduce or eliminate the WD pathogen from existing state production facilities. <br />18. Buy or lease WD- trout hatcheries. <br />19. Buy WD- trout from the private sector. <br />20. Modify existing WD- state hatcheries to produce more fish. <br />21. Trade for WD- trout from federal hatcheries. <br />22. Produce only fry and fingerling trout at WD- state hatcheries. <br />49