My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8057
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8057
Author
Bennett, J. R., D. A. Krieger, T. P. Nesler, L. E. Harris and R. B. Nehring.
Title
An Assessment Of Fishery Management And Fish Production Alternatives To Reduce The Impact Of Whirling Disease In Colorado.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the capability for natural reproduction (most notably high lakes) or cannot produce enough fish to <br />keep up with angler harvest (drive-to small mountain lakes and streams). Therefore, many of <br />these waters receive supplemental stocking of fry or fingerling fish and may be under harvest <br />restrictions. <br />Most of the state's aquatic resources (53%) are in the 99,362 acres that occur in the <br />Optimum Use category. Only 1% of total statewide production (51,000 fish) of catchable trout <br />were stocked in these waters in 1992, while 49% of all coldwater fiy, fingerling and subcatchables <br />(6,000,000) were stocked into Optimum Use category waters. DOW's cost per recreation day in <br />the Optimum Use category was $1.24 in 1992, and 17 recreation days were generated by each <br />acre of habitat. <br />It is estimated that the Optimum Use waters produce 30% of statewide recreation days <br />(Table 4). The catch in lakes (and associated recreation days) in this category definitely depends <br />upon fry and fingerling stocking, while the contribution to the catch in streams from stocked fish <br />varies significantly by region. <br />Special Use Category <br />Special Use management is designed to preserve and enhance selected species or to provide <br />specialized fishing recreation within the biological and physical capability of the environment to <br />support the designated use at the least cost. The primary management objective is to preserve <br />and enhance selected species (including those listed as special concern, threatened, or endangered) <br />or to provide anglers the opportunity to catch but not always harvest either wild fish, large fish, or <br />unique species. Stocking, if necessary, is at a level similar to what would be produced naturally. <br />Special harvest regulations are frequently used to meet management objectives. <br />The waters in this category include native cutthroat habitats and Gold Medal designated <br />streams and lakes. Most have good potential for natural reproduction and are not stocked, but <br />harvest restrictions are imposed on many of them. <br />Only 11,012 acres (6% of public waters) in Colorado are managed for Special Use <br />objectives. The Special Use waters were stocked in 1992 with 1% of statewide production of <br />catchable trout and only 3% of fry, fingerling, and subcatchable trout production. This category <br />of waters accounted for 8% of total fishing recreation days in 1992 (Table 4). Catch rates and <br />recreation days vary among areas, while trout density and biomass are dependent upon natural <br />reproduction. The cost per recreation day in this category was $0.19 in 1992 with 37 recreation <br />days generated by each acre of habitat. <br />Whirling Disease Impacts to Fishing Recreation <br />The Categorization System can be used to estimate the potential impact of our current and <br />future fish stocking decisions on fishing recreation days. However, in doing so, we assume that <br />17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.