My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8057
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8057
Author
Bennett, J. R., D. A. Krieger, T. P. Nesler, L. E. Harris and R. B. Nehring.
Title
An Assessment Of Fishery Management And Fish Production Alternatives To Reduce The Impact Of Whirling Disease In Colorado.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In 1992, 75,185 acres (41% of state waters) were in the managed Intensive Use category. <br />At that time, 98% of total statewide production of catchable trout (4,700,000), and 48% of fiy, <br />fingerling, and subcatchable trout (5,900,000 fish) were stocked in Intensive Use waters. <br />It is estimated that 62% of the 1992 statewide recreation days occurred in the Intensive Use <br />category, varying from a high of 75% of the recreation days in the CE Region to a low of 48% in <br />the SW Region (Table 4). DOW's cost per recreation day was estimated at $1.53. In 1992, the <br />Intensive Use category statewide generated 45 recreation days per acre, with DOW biologists <br />estimating that approximately 85% of the recreation days in this category depended on the <br />stocking of catchable trout. <br />Table 4. Total (coldwater and warmwater) 1992 recreation days by category for each region <br />("old" regional boundaries) from the 1992 Categorization System, DOW. <br /> INTENSIVE OPTIMUM SPECIAL <br />REGION <br />REC.DAYS <br />PERCENT <br />REC. DAYS <br />PERCENT <br />REC. DAYS <br />PERCENT' <br />NE 545,000 66 251,700 31 22,400 3 <br />CE 1,017,000 75 238,000 17 110,200 8 <br />SE 712,900 55 434,000 34 141,000 11 <br />NW 425,200 67 132,000 21 72,000 11 <br />SW 442,300 48 427,500 46 58,000 6 <br />TOTAL 3,142,400 62.5 1,483,200 29.5 403,600 8 <br />Optimum Use Category <br />Optimum Use management is designed to provide fishing recreation within the limits of the <br />habitat to produce fish at the least cost, while allowing anglers to catch and keep fish within the <br />water's natural productivity. Stocking, when necessary, is at a level similar to what would be <br />produced naturally if all habitat requirements were satisfied. Regulations that encourage limiting <br />fish harvest to the natural productive capability of the habitat are imposed. Some of the state's <br />designated wild trout waters are in the Optimum Use category. <br />Waters in this category have physical and biological characteristics that support more viable <br />and robust fish populations than those found in the Intensive Use category waters. Optimum <br />Use waters include high lakes, headwater streams, wild trout streams, nonurban warmwater lakes, <br />and more productive mountain lakes and reservoirs. Although these waters have adequate to <br />excellent potential in producing fish populations that are attractive to anglers, some do not have <br />16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.