My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8080
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:22:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8080
Author
Beard, J. M.
Title
Pond Removal and Stocking Procedures of Razorback Suckers
USFW Year
1988a.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The following is a synopsis of the procedures utilized in removing <br />razorback suckers (Xyrauchen texanus) from rearing ponds located at Ouray <br />National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Utah, and the subsequent stocking of these <br />fish into the Green River near Jensen, Utah, in September 1988. The <br />information is categorized under specified headings for ease of understanding <br />and organization. A calendar for the month of September, 1988 is provided at <br />the end of this report with references to all activities involved in this <br />operation. <br />Background Information <br />An experimental razorback sucker facility was established in 1986 at Ouray <br />NWR that consists of three 1/10 acre earthen rearing ponds, a building that <br />houses incubators and rearing tanks, a trailer, a building for storage, and a <br />well. Artificial spawning techniques on wild fish that started in late April <br />and ended in mid-May 1987, resulted in the propagation of 3254 fry which were <br />stocked into 2 of the 3 ponds. In late October and early November 1987, these <br />ponds were seined and produced 2986 fish which were weighed and measured. In <br />an effort to determine the effects of overwintering on the fish, 1425 fish <br />were returned to one of the ponds, and the remaining fish housed indoors in <br />circular tanks. In mid-April 1988, the pond was seined, and the fish, along <br />with those from the indoor tanks, were weighed and measured. The fish from <br />the pond were then combined with the fish from the indoor tanks, and returned <br />5 back into pond #1. A total of 2576 fish were pt_into _ond_L1. In early <br />September 1988, pond #1 was seined, the fish weighed, measured, fin-clipped, <br />and subsequently stocked into the Green River in mid-September 1988. <br />In late April 1988, artificial spawning techniques on wild fish had again <br />taken place, however efforts to hatch the eggs failed. In early June 1988,' <br />continuing efforts to hatch eggs resulted in the propagation of 2100 fry. <br />In mid-June 1988, 1500 fry were released into pond #3, and 600 fry were <br />housed indoors for feeding trials. In mid-September 1988, pond #3 was seined, <br />the fish weighed, measured, fin-clipped, and consequently stocked into the <br />Green River in late September 1988. <br />In summary, fish that were stocked into the Green River from pond #1 had <br />been held in captivity for approximately 16 months, while those from pond #3 <br />had been held in captivity for approximately 4 months. All references to <br />these propagated razorback suckers will hereafter be delineated as pond #1 or <br />pond #3 fish. <br />Pond Aquatic Vegetation Removal <br />Due to the large amount of aquatic vegetation within the ponds, it was <br />difficult to seine out fish. Thus, it was determined that removal of the <br />aquatic vegetation would result in more favorable seines. Aquatic vegetation <br />near the shoreline was removed with hand-held rakes. Initially, a single <br />strand of barbed wire was utilized to remove the remaining aquatic vegetation. <br />A person stationed on either side of the pond pulled the barbed wire through <br />the water along the longest dimension. After 2 to 3 "pulls" the amount of <br />aquatic vegetation began to drastically decrease, so a section of horse fence <br />was utilized. It soon became apparent that if the horse fence had barbs like <br />barbed wire, more aquatic vegetation would be removed. An aquatic vegetation <br />removal device (A.V.R.D.) was constructed using 3 strands of barred wire and <br />wire stays for support. The top strand was longer than the middle or bottom <br />strands so that it could be pulled from the top of the pond bank as the water
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.