Water Quality 17
<br />USEPA SDWR for MBAS of 0.5 mg/L (table 2). This exceed-
<br />ance may indicate the local contamination of ground water by
<br />waste from an ISDS. Detection of anthropogenic surfactants
<br />probably relates more to the failure of individual ISDS's rather
<br />than being representative of the entire ISDS area. Other
<br />detected concentrations of MBAS were too low to discern
<br />whether the surfactants were naturally occurring or had an
<br />anthropogenic source.
<br />Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that is
<br />formed from the decay of uranium. Major sources of radon
<br />include rocks containing uranium minerals, soils derived from
<br />such rocks, and ground water that has been in contact with ura-
<br />nium-bearing rocks and soils. Uranium decays to radium (and
<br />other products) and then to radon, which is soluble in water and
<br />occurs in ground water as a gas. Radon can be present in indoor
<br />air as a result of seepage from soils underneath a building (the
<br />primary mechanism) or through the use of well water (through
<br />aeration) that contains radon. The primary public health risk
<br />associated with radon is the breathing of radon from indoor air
<br />in homes (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000b). The
<br />National Research Council estimated that the radon in indoor
<br />air resulting from the breakdown of uranium in soils has con-
<br />tributed to about 20,000 lung cancer deaths each year in the
<br />United States (National Research Council, 1999). Only a small
<br />portion of radon in indoor air is derived from the aeration of
<br />radon-containing well water through household use of the
<br />water. This source can, however, increase a person's risk of
<br />lung cancer over a lifetime. Drinking water that contains radon
<br />presents a risk of internal-organ cancers, particularly stomach
<br />cancer (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000b). Radon
<br />can be removed from well water through the use of carbon
<br />filters or aeration devices (U.S. Environmental Protection
<br />Agency, 2000b).
<br />Different isotopes of radon are produced by the decay of
<br />radium, but only one, radon-222, has environmental importance
<br />(Hem, 1992). Excluding site 1, which was sampled only in 2000
<br />and 2001, three of the water samples collected from each well
<br />in 1998 and 1999 were analyzed for radon-222. Concentrations
<br />ranged from 365 to 6,380 pCi/L (picocuries per liter), and the
<br />median concentration was 760 pCi/L (table 2). All concentra-
<br />tions exceeded the USEPA-proposed MCL for radon-222 in
<br />drinking water of 300 pCi/L (table 2), which is under review.
<br />When variability and uncertainty in radon-222 concentrations
<br />were taken into account (table 8, Appendix II), part of the con-
<br />centration range for one sample was less than the USEPA-
<br />proposed MCL. Among the 10 wells, water samples from site 4,
<br />an alluvial aquifer well immediately west of Fraser, had the
<br />highest median radon-222 concentration (6,170 pCi/L). This
<br />concentration was more than three times higher than the next
<br />highest median concentration (fig. 7). All radon-222 concentra-
<br />tions for site 4 were greater than the USEPA-proposed alterna-
<br />tive MCL for radon-222 in drinking water of 4,000 pCi/L
<br />(table 2), which also is under review. Statistically significant
<br />differences in radon-222 concentrations were not indicated for
<br />samples from wells completed in the alluvial aquifer and wells
<br />completed in the Troublesome Formation aquifer (table 3).
<br />Radon-222 concentrations in ground-water samples from wells
<br />in the Fraser River watershed were similar to concentrations in
<br />ground-water samples from wells in other areas of the Upper
<br />Colorado River Basin in Colorado, which ranged from 305 to
<br />4,030 pCi/L in 1997 (Apodaca and others, 2000).
<br />Changes Over Time
<br />For each well except sites 1 and 3, data for field properties
<br />and water-quality constituents for ground-water samples were
<br />examined qualitatively for changes over time by using
<br />LOWESS smooth curves. Insufficient data were available for
<br />wells 1 and 3 to be included in the analysis. Properties and con-
<br />stituents that were graphed included water temperature, specific
<br />conductance, dissolved-oxygen concentration, pH, turbidity,
<br />alkalinity, dissolved solids, major ions (calcium, chloride,
<br />magnesium, potassium, silica, sodium, and sulfate), manga-
<br />nese, nutrients (nitrate and orthophosphate), and dissolved
<br />organic carbon. For most constituents from most wells, changes
<br />in the data over time were not apparent. Changes were apparent,
<br />however, for samples from site 7, an alluvial aquifer well in the
<br />Tabernash area. Specific conductance and calcium, magnesium,
<br />chloride, and sulfate concentrations appeared to increase over
<br />time (fig. 8). These changes are qualitative changes only and are
<br />not legitimate statistical trends because of the short time periods
<br />of the data collection, the small sample sizes, and data collec-
<br />tion only occurring in 2 months of each year. The change in spe-
<br />cific conductance probably was a function of higher
<br />concentrations of calcium, magnesium, chloride, and sulfate
<br />over portions of the sampling period. Calcium and magnesium
<br />concentrations generally increased between May 1999 and May
<br />2001, whereas chloride and sulfate concentrations increased
<br />after May 2000, respectively (fig. 8). The apparent increases in
<br />specific conductance and calcium, magnesium, chloride, and
<br />sulfate concentrations for site 7 had little effect on water quality
<br />of the well, but the changes indicate that shallow ground water
<br />could be susceptible to changes in land use in the watershed.
<br />Specific conductance remained moderate, and the water
<br />remained suitable for use. Chloride and sulfate concentrations
<br />remained well below the USEPA drinking-water standard of
<br />250 mg/L for each constituent (table 2).
<br />Surface Water
<br />As stated previously, field properties for the surface-
<br />water site Fraser River below Crooked Creek at Tabernash
<br />(hereinafter Fraser River at Tabernash) were measured
<br />bimonthly between August 1998 and September 2001, and
<br />water samples were collected for laboratory analyses during
<br />each site visit. The resulting data for WY's 1999, 2000, and
|