Laserfiche WebLink
Water Quality 17 <br />USEPA SDWR for MBAS of 0.5 mg/L (table 2). This exceed- <br />ance may indicate the local contamination of ground water by <br />waste from an ISDS. Detection of anthropogenic surfactants <br />probably relates more to the failure of individual ISDS's rather <br />than being representative of the entire ISDS area. Other <br />detected concentrations of MBAS were too low to discern <br />whether the surfactants were naturally occurring or had an <br />anthropogenic source. <br />Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that is <br />formed from the decay of uranium. Major sources of radon <br />include rocks containing uranium minerals, soils derived from <br />such rocks, and ground water that has been in contact with ura- <br />nium-bearing rocks and soils. Uranium decays to radium (and <br />other products) and then to radon, which is soluble in water and <br />occurs in ground water as a gas. Radon can be present in indoor <br />air as a result of seepage from soils underneath a building (the <br />primary mechanism) or through the use of well water (through <br />aeration) that contains radon. The primary public health risk <br />associated with radon is the breathing of radon from indoor air <br />in homes (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000b). The <br />National Research Council estimated that the radon in indoor <br />air resulting from the breakdown of uranium in soils has con- <br />tributed to about 20,000 lung cancer deaths each year in the <br />United States (National Research Council, 1999). Only a small <br />portion of radon in indoor air is derived from the aeration of <br />radon-containing well water through household use of the <br />water. This source can, however, increase a person's risk of <br />lung cancer over a lifetime. Drinking water that contains radon <br />presents a risk of internal-organ cancers, particularly stomach <br />cancer (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000b). Radon <br />can be removed from well water through the use of carbon <br />filters or aeration devices (U.S. Environmental Protection <br />Agency, 2000b). <br />Different isotopes of radon are produced by the decay of <br />radium, but only one, radon-222, has environmental importance <br />(Hem, 1992). Excluding site 1, which was sampled only in 2000 <br />and 2001, three of the water samples collected from each well <br />in 1998 and 1999 were analyzed for radon-222. Concentrations <br />ranged from 365 to 6,380 pCi/L (picocuries per liter), and the <br />median concentration was 760 pCi/L (table 2). All concentra- <br />tions exceeded the USEPA-proposed MCL for radon-222 in <br />drinking water of 300 pCi/L (table 2), which is under review. <br />When variability and uncertainty in radon-222 concentrations <br />were taken into account (table 8, Appendix II), part of the con- <br />centration range for one sample was less than the USEPA- <br />proposed MCL. Among the 10 wells, water samples from site 4, <br />an alluvial aquifer well immediately west of Fraser, had the <br />highest median radon-222 concentration (6,170 pCi/L). This <br />concentration was more than three times higher than the next <br />highest median concentration (fig. 7). All radon-222 concentra- <br />tions for site 4 were greater than the USEPA-proposed alterna- <br />tive MCL for radon-222 in drinking water of 4,000 pCi/L <br />(table 2), which also is under review. Statistically significant <br />differences in radon-222 concentrations were not indicated for <br />samples from wells completed in the alluvial aquifer and wells <br />completed in the Troublesome Formation aquifer (table 3). <br />Radon-222 concentrations in ground-water samples from wells <br />in the Fraser River watershed were similar to concentrations in <br />ground-water samples from wells in other areas of the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin in Colorado, which ranged from 305 to <br />4,030 pCi/L in 1997 (Apodaca and others, 2000). <br />Changes Over Time <br />For each well except sites 1 and 3, data for field properties <br />and water-quality constituents for ground-water samples were <br />examined qualitatively for changes over time by using <br />LOWESS smooth curves. Insufficient data were available for <br />wells 1 and 3 to be included in the analysis. Properties and con- <br />stituents that were graphed included water temperature, specific <br />conductance, dissolved-oxygen concentration, pH, turbidity, <br />alkalinity, dissolved solids, major ions (calcium, chloride, <br />magnesium, potassium, silica, sodium, and sulfate), manga- <br />nese, nutrients (nitrate and orthophosphate), and dissolved <br />organic carbon. For most constituents from most wells, changes <br />in the data over time were not apparent. Changes were apparent, <br />however, for samples from site 7, an alluvial aquifer well in the <br />Tabernash area. Specific conductance and calcium, magnesium, <br />chloride, and sulfate concentrations appeared to increase over <br />time (fig. 8). These changes are qualitative changes only and are <br />not legitimate statistical trends because of the short time periods <br />of the data collection, the small sample sizes, and data collec- <br />tion only occurring in 2 months of each year. The change in spe- <br />cific conductance probably was a function of higher <br />concentrations of calcium, magnesium, chloride, and sulfate <br />over portions of the sampling period. Calcium and magnesium <br />concentrations generally increased between May 1999 and May <br />2001, whereas chloride and sulfate concentrations increased <br />after May 2000, respectively (fig. 8). The apparent increases in <br />specific conductance and calcium, magnesium, chloride, and <br />sulfate concentrations for site 7 had little effect on water quality <br />of the well, but the changes indicate that shallow ground water <br />could be susceptible to changes in land use in the watershed. <br />Specific conductance remained moderate, and the water <br />remained suitable for use. Chloride and sulfate concentrations <br />remained well below the USEPA drinking-water standard of <br />250 mg/L for each constituent (table 2). <br />Surface Water <br />As stated previously, field properties for the surface- <br />water site Fraser River below Crooked Creek at Tabernash <br />(hereinafter Fraser River at Tabernash) were measured <br />bimonthly between August 1998 and September 2001, and <br />water samples were collected for laboratory analyses during <br />each site visit. The resulting data for WY's 1999, 2000, and