16 Water-Quality Characteristics and Ground-Water Quantity of the Fraser River Watershed, Grand County, Colorado, 1998-2001
<br />the mineral apatite (Hem, 1992). Although little information is
<br />available on the mineralogy of the Troublesome Formation,
<br />significantly higher concentrations of orthophosphate in water
<br />samples from the Troublesome Formation aquifer could indi-
<br />cate that apatite is the major source of orthophosphate in the
<br />study area.
<br />Naturally occurring dissolved organic carbon in ground
<br />water is the result of biological and biochemical decay and
<br />degradation processes in soil and, as such, usually is assumed to
<br />be similar to the organic material present in soils in the ground-
<br />water recharge area (Hem, 1992). Anthropogenic sources of
<br />dissolved organic carbon include organic amendments to soil,
<br />such as animal manure, and leachate from landfills or septic-
<br />disposal systems. The naturally occurring and anthropogeni-
<br />cally derived organic solutes that constitute dissolved organic
<br />carbon can function as nutrients for microbiota, affect metal
<br />solubility, participate in oxidation/reduction reactions, and
<br />affect physical and chemical properties of solid/liquid or liquid/
<br />gas interfaces. Certain organic solutes are toxic to aquatic and
<br />other life forms and can cause water to be unusable for human
<br />activities (Hem, 1992).
<br />Dissolved organic carbon concentrations in ground-water
<br />samples from the wells in the Fraser River watershed ranged
<br />from 0.2 to 4.0 mg/L, and the median concentration was
<br />0.91 mg/L (table 2). The highest concentrations, 3.0 mg/L and
<br />greater, were detected in all four water samples from site 1, the
<br />very shallow (18 ft) alluvial aquifer well located between
<br />Winter Park and Fraser. Samples from site 6, east-southeast of
<br />Tabernash, and from sites 7, 8, and 9, near Tabernash, had
<br />median dissolved organic carbon concentrations exceeding
<br />1.0 mg/L. All four wells also were alluvial aquifer wells.
<br />Dissolved organic carbon concentrations were higher in
<br />water samples from wells completed in the alluvial aquifer and
<br />in non-ISDS areas than those from wells completed in the Trou-
<br />blesome Formation aquifer and in ISDS areas (table 3). There
<br />was, however, some overlap between dissolved organic carbon
<br />concentrations in samples from ISDS and non-ISDS areas
<br />(fig. 6). The concentration differences between these two areas
<br />likely have no environmental significance. High concentrations
<br />of dissolved organic carbon in ground water likely are the result
<br />of the decay of organic compounds associated with natural
<br />vegetation in the area. Concentrations in water samples from
<br />site 1, which is in a pasture, also could reflect the effects of
<br />animal waste.
<br />Bacteria, Methylene Blue Active Substances, and
<br />Radon-222
<br />Total coliform bacteria are used as indicator bacteria to
<br />assess the sanitary quality of water and the potential public
<br />health risk from waterborne diseases. They typically do not
<br />cause disease themselves but are correlated to the presence of
<br />several waterborne organisms or pathogens that do cause dis-
<br />ease (Myers and Sylvester, 1997). Coliform bacteria can be
<br />z
<br />cc
<br />U J
<br />LUz
<br />zam
<br />U)
<br />cc Q U
<br />0 cc
<br />02<
<br />W J
<br />J
<br />oz
<br />0
<br />NUMBER OF SAMPLES
<br />(31) (39)
<br />I?
<br />PRESENT ABSENT
<br />EXPLANATION
<br />X Outlier
<br />90th percentile
<br />75th percentile
<br />50th percentile (median)
<br />Lim 25th percentile
<br />10th percentile
<br />Figure 6. Distribution of dissolved organic carbon concentra-
<br />tions by presence or absence of individual septic disposal
<br />systems for wells in the Fraser River watershed, 1998-2001.
<br />present in soil naturally or may occur as a result of animal or
<br />human waste.
<br />For the 11 wells, total coliform bacteria were detected in
<br />one or two water samples from each of six wells (sites 1, 3, 4,
<br />6, 7, and 8). Overall, the bacteria were detected in 9 of 68
<br />ground-water samples, or 13 percent. All but two samples (both
<br />for site 1) had bacteria concentrations less than or equal to
<br />4 col/100 mL (colonies per 100 milliliters). Soil was the most
<br />likely source for the low concentrations of total coliform bacte-
<br />ria in water samples from sites 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and animal
<br />waste was the likely source of the bacteria in samples from
<br />site 1. Of these six wells, all were completed in the alluvial
<br />aquifer, except for site 3, which was completed in the Trouble-
<br />some Formation aquifer. All nine samples with detections of
<br />total coliform bacteria also were analyzed for E. coh, an
<br />indication of fecal contamination; E. coli were not detected.
<br />Because each well was sampled only once in each month
<br />that sampling occurred, insufficient data were available to com-
<br />pare the total coliform counts for each well to the USEPA
<br />MCLG, which specifies no more than 5 percent of the samples
<br />in a month test positive for total coliform (table 2). Except for
<br />site 1, total coliform bacteria were not a ground-water-quality
<br />issue.
<br />MBAS are natural or synthetic anionic surfactants; the
<br />synthetic surfactants are present in many types of soaps and
<br />detergents (Burkhardt and others, 1995). Detection of MBAS in
<br />water samples can be an indicator of contamination by waste-
<br />water. Most (57 of 69) water samples from the 11 wells did not
<br />contain detectable concentrations of MBAS, including all sam-
<br />ples from the 4 wells completed in the Troublesome Formation
<br />aquifer. All detected concentrations except one were in water
<br />samples from alluvial aquifer wells. MBAS concentrations
<br />ranged from less than 0.02 to 3.82 mg/L (table 2), and all but the
<br />maximum concentration were less than or equal to 0.10 mg/L.
<br />The maximum concentration, detected in a sample from site 8
<br />in an ISDS area, was the only concentration higher than the
|