Laserfiche WebLink
16 Water-Quality Characteristics and Ground-Water Quantity of the Fraser River Watershed, Grand County, Colorado, 1998-2001 <br />the mineral apatite (Hem, 1992). Although little information is <br />available on the mineralogy of the Troublesome Formation, <br />significantly higher concentrations of orthophosphate in water <br />samples from the Troublesome Formation aquifer could indi- <br />cate that apatite is the major source of orthophosphate in the <br />study area. <br />Naturally occurring dissolved organic carbon in ground <br />water is the result of biological and biochemical decay and <br />degradation processes in soil and, as such, usually is assumed to <br />be similar to the organic material present in soils in the ground- <br />water recharge area (Hem, 1992). Anthropogenic sources of <br />dissolved organic carbon include organic amendments to soil, <br />such as animal manure, and leachate from landfills or septic- <br />disposal systems. The naturally occurring and anthropogeni- <br />cally derived organic solutes that constitute dissolved organic <br />carbon can function as nutrients for microbiota, affect metal <br />solubility, participate in oxidation/reduction reactions, and <br />affect physical and chemical properties of solid/liquid or liquid/ <br />gas interfaces. Certain organic solutes are toxic to aquatic and <br />other life forms and can cause water to be unusable for human <br />activities (Hem, 1992). <br />Dissolved organic carbon concentrations in ground-water <br />samples from the wells in the Fraser River watershed ranged <br />from 0.2 to 4.0 mg/L, and the median concentration was <br />0.91 mg/L (table 2). The highest concentrations, 3.0 mg/L and <br />greater, were detected in all four water samples from site 1, the <br />very shallow (18 ft) alluvial aquifer well located between <br />Winter Park and Fraser. Samples from site 6, east-southeast of <br />Tabernash, and from sites 7, 8, and 9, near Tabernash, had <br />median dissolved organic carbon concentrations exceeding <br />1.0 mg/L. All four wells also were alluvial aquifer wells. <br />Dissolved organic carbon concentrations were higher in <br />water samples from wells completed in the alluvial aquifer and <br />in non-ISDS areas than those from wells completed in the Trou- <br />blesome Formation aquifer and in ISDS areas (table 3). There <br />was, however, some overlap between dissolved organic carbon <br />concentrations in samples from ISDS and non-ISDS areas <br />(fig. 6). The concentration differences between these two areas <br />likely have no environmental significance. High concentrations <br />of dissolved organic carbon in ground water likely are the result <br />of the decay of organic compounds associated with natural <br />vegetation in the area. Concentrations in water samples from <br />site 1, which is in a pasture, also could reflect the effects of <br />animal waste. <br />Bacteria, Methylene Blue Active Substances, and <br />Radon-222 <br />Total coliform bacteria are used as indicator bacteria to <br />assess the sanitary quality of water and the potential public <br />health risk from waterborne diseases. They typically do not <br />cause disease themselves but are correlated to the presence of <br />several waterborne organisms or pathogens that do cause dis- <br />ease (Myers and Sylvester, 1997). Coliform bacteria can be <br />z <br />cc <br />U J <br />LUz <br />zam <br />U) <br />cc Q U <br />0 cc <br />02< <br />W J <br />J <br />oz <br />0 <br />NUMBER OF SAMPLES <br />(31) (39) <br />I? <br />PRESENT ABSENT <br />EXPLANATION <br />X Outlier <br />90th percentile <br />75th percentile <br />50th percentile (median) <br />Lim 25th percentile <br />10th percentile <br />Figure 6. Distribution of dissolved organic carbon concentra- <br />tions by presence or absence of individual septic disposal <br />systems for wells in the Fraser River watershed, 1998-2001. <br />present in soil naturally or may occur as a result of animal or <br />human waste. <br />For the 11 wells, total coliform bacteria were detected in <br />one or two water samples from each of six wells (sites 1, 3, 4, <br />6, 7, and 8). Overall, the bacteria were detected in 9 of 68 <br />ground-water samples, or 13 percent. All but two samples (both <br />for site 1) had bacteria concentrations less than or equal to <br />4 col/100 mL (colonies per 100 milliliters). Soil was the most <br />likely source for the low concentrations of total coliform bacte- <br />ria in water samples from sites 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8, and animal <br />waste was the likely source of the bacteria in samples from <br />site 1. Of these six wells, all were completed in the alluvial <br />aquifer, except for site 3, which was completed in the Trouble- <br />some Formation aquifer. All nine samples with detections of <br />total coliform bacteria also were analyzed for E. coh, an <br />indication of fecal contamination; E. coli were not detected. <br />Because each well was sampled only once in each month <br />that sampling occurred, insufficient data were available to com- <br />pare the total coliform counts for each well to the USEPA <br />MCLG, which specifies no more than 5 percent of the samples <br />in a month test positive for total coliform (table 2). Except for <br />site 1, total coliform bacteria were not a ground-water-quality <br />issue. <br />MBAS are natural or synthetic anionic surfactants; the <br />synthetic surfactants are present in many types of soaps and <br />detergents (Burkhardt and others, 1995). Detection of MBAS in <br />water samples can be an indicator of contamination by waste- <br />water. Most (57 of 69) water samples from the 11 wells did not <br />contain detectable concentrations of MBAS, including all sam- <br />ples from the 4 wells completed in the Troublesome Formation <br />aquifer. All detected concentrations except one were in water <br />samples from alluvial aquifer wells. MBAS concentrations <br />ranged from less than 0.02 to 3.82 mg/L (table 2), and all but the <br />maximum concentration were less than or equal to 0.10 mg/L. <br />The maximum concentration, detected in a sample from site 8 <br />in an ISDS area, was the only concentration higher than the