Laserfiche WebLink
References Cited 9 <br />Table 4. Results of the seasonal Kendall test for trends on selected nutrient species in the Fraser River Basin, 1991 and 1995 <br />through 2000. <br />[mg/L, milligrams per liter; (mg/L)/yr, milligrams per liter per year; <, less than; --, no data] <br />Site Site Span Number of Number of Minimum Data used p-value Trend Slope Median <br />number name of trend analyses censored reporting in trend of tau direction [(mg/L)/yr] concentration <br />(fig. 1) analysis analyses level analysis test (mg/L) <br /> (mg/L) <br /> Ammonia <br />3 Fraser River below Vasquez 1991-2000 108 22 < 0.002 Raw 0.0001 Down -0.002 0.018 <br /> Creek at Winter Park, CO <br />4 Fraser River at Tabernash, CO 1991-2000 108 10 < 0.002 Raw 0.1137 None 0.058 <br /> Flow-adjusted 0.4003 None <br />Nitrite plus nitrate <br />1 Fraser River at Upper Station, 1995-2000 61 2 <0.005 Raw 0.0032 Up 0.0057 0.084 <br /> near Winter Park, CO Flow-adjusted 0.0238 Up 0.007 <br />2 Fraser River below Buck 1991-2000 100 2 <0.005 Raw 0.0341 Down -0.0023 0.078 <br /> Creek at Winter Park, CO Flow-adjusted 0.1335 None <br />3 Fraser River below Vasquez 1991-2000 103 1 <0.010 Raw 0.2056 None 0.141 <br /> Creek at Winter Park, CO Flow-adjusted 0.9210 None <br />4 Fraser River at Tabernash, CO 1991-2000 105 1 <0.005 Raw 0.2255 None 0.174 <br /> Flow-adjusted 0.0414 Up 0.007 <br /> Orthophosphorus <br />3 Fraser River below Vasquez 1995-2000 61 7 <0.001 Raw 0.0125 Up 0.001 0.010 <br /> Creek at Winter Park, CO <br />4 Fraser River at Tabernash, CO 1995-2000 66 0 --- Raw 0.0076 Up 0.004 0.052 <br /> Flow-adjusted 0.0627 None <br />Summary <br />In general, the water in the Fraser River Basin is of <br />good quality and compares favorably with State standards. <br />A few pH values were greater than State standards, and even <br />in these instances, the river was not out of compliance because <br />of the limited number of exceedances. Un-ionized ammonia, <br />nitrite plus nitrate, and chloride concentrations did not exceed <br />any applicable State standard. Concentrations and loads of <br />nutrients increased downstream; the largest inputs into the river <br />were between Fraser River below Vasquez Creek at Winter <br />Park (site 3) and Fraser River at Tabemash (site 4). Wastewater- <br />treatment-plant discharges enter the Fraser River upstream <br />from site 4. Median monthly loading data for nutrients <br />and chloride indicate that the largest nutrient and chloride <br />loading happens during early spring before the onset of <br />spring runoff. <br />Seasonal Kendall trend results indicate downward <br />trends for ammonia concentration at Fraser River below <br />Vasquez Creek at Winter Park (site 3) during the period of this <br />study. Nitrite plus nitrate concentrations had upward trends at <br />Fraser River at Tabernash (site 4) for the available data during <br />1995 through 2000. Results from the trend testing on nitrite <br />plus nitrate concentrations during 1991 through 2000 at Fraser <br />River below Buck Creek (site 2) had a downward trend and <br />Fraser River at Tabernash (site 4) had an upward trend. Con- <br />centrations of orthophosphorus showed consistently upward <br />trends at both the Fraser River below Vasquez Creek at Winter <br />Park and Fraser River at Tabernash sites. <br />References Cited <br />Apodaca, L.E., and Bails, J.B., 1999, Fraser River watershed, <br />Colorado-Assessment of available water-quantity and water- <br />quality data through water year 1997: U.S. Geological Survey <br />Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4255, 58 p. <br />Cleveland, W.S., 1979, Robust locally weighted regression and <br />smoothing scatterplots: Journal of the American Statistical <br />Association, v. 74, p. 829-836. <br />Colorado Water Quality Control Commission, 2001, June 30 <br />(2001) Classifications and numeric standards for Upper <br />Colorado River Basin and North Platte River (Planning <br />Region 12) Regulation 33: Colorado Department of Public <br />Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Commis- <br />sion [variously paginated]. <br />Colorado Water Quality Control Division, 1989, Colorado <br />nonpoint assessment report: Denver, Colorado Department <br />of Public Health and Environment, 189 p.