My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9623
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9623
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:30:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9623
Author
Bails, J. B.
Title
Streamwater Quality at Selected Sites in the Fraser Basin, Grand County, Colorado, Water Years 1991-2000.
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8 Streamwater Quality at Selected Sites in the Fraser River Basin, Grand County, Colorado, Water Years 1991-2000 <br />all cases, the two trend slopes were almost identical, indicating <br />little sensitivity to the trend analysis because of the censored <br />data. <br />Trend analyses for ammonia at sites 1 and 2 were not <br />done because of the large number (greater than 20 percent) <br />of censored concentrations. Only site 3 had a statistically <br />significant trend for ammonia and showed a downward trend <br />in concentration for 1991-2000. <br />Nitrite plus nitrate trend analysis revealed two sites <br />(sites 1 and 4) with upward trends, although not over the same <br />time period, and one site (site 2) with al downward trend. The <br />upward trends at site 1 on both the raw and flow-adjusted data <br />are likely due to an increase in nitrite plus nitrate sources in <br />the upper reaches of the Fraser River. Because the period of <br />record for site 1 is different from the other three sites, a direct <br />relation in the trend for site 1 cannot be made with the other <br />three sites. The trend analysis at site 2 resulted in a downward <br />trend on the raw data and no trend on the flow-adjusted data. <br />Site 2 results indicate that the inputs of nitrite plus nitrate to <br />0.050 <br />the Fraser River above site 2 are not changing, but some other <br />factor, such as streamflow, chemistry, or biological uptake, <br />is causing the concentrations to decrease. The trend results <br />from site 4 show the opposite conditions. Although there is <br />an upward trend for the flow-adjusted data, indicating a pos- <br />sible increase in the input of nitrite plus nitrate to the stream, <br />the raw concentrations remain stable. Trend analysis on <br />streamflow measurements at site 4 indicate an upward trend, <br />and this relation may be caused by site 4 being located down- <br />stream from the three wastewater-treatment plants. <br />Trend analysis was not done for orthophosphorus <br />at sites 1 and 2 because of the large number (greater that <br />20 percent) of censored concentrations. Results for the trend <br />analyses at sites 3 and 4 indicate upward trends in the ortho- <br />phosphorus concentrations at both sites. The lack of a trend <br />for the flow-adjusted orthophosphorus concentrations at site 4 <br />indicates that the upward trends may be caused by streamflow <br />conditions and not increases in orthophosphorus inputs to the <br />river. <br />Ammonia <br />/\ - - Nitrite plus nitrate <br />\ Dissolved phosphorus <br />- \ Orthophosphorus <br />Total phosphorus <br />- - - Discharge <br />\ <br />........... <br />77, <br />Q 0.045 <br />° <br />W 0.040 <br />IL <br />Z 0.035 <br />0 <br />l-- 0.030 <br />z <br />0.025 <br />Q <br />OJ 0.020 <br />H <br />WZ 0.015 <br />CE 0.010 <br />Z 0.005 <br />0 <br />1.6 <br />Q <br />° 1.4 <br />w <br />0- <br />u) 1.2 <br />z <br />O <br />F' 1.0 <br />Z <br />° 0.8 <br />O <br />J <br />w 0.6 <br />0 <br />0: <br />O 0.4 <br />J <br />2 <br />U 0.2 <br />0 <br />Chloride <br />- - - Discharge <br /> <br /> / <br /> / <br /> <br /> / <br /> / <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />/ <br />/ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV <br />MONTH <br />300 <br />250 H <br />W <br />W <br />LL <br />200 U <br />E-5 Z <br />Z) <br />UO <br />150 U <br />Z W <br />co <br />W <br />111 <br />100 CC <br />Q <br />2 <br />U <br />50 _Ln <br />0 <br />300 <br />H <br />250 W <br />LL <br />U <br />200 m Z <br />UO <br />Zw <br />150 - u) <br />wa: <br />Cr CL <br />100 Q <br />2 <br />U <br />U) <br />50 0 <br />J0 <br />DEC <br />Figure 4. Median instantaneous load for each month of selected constituents and monthly median <br />discharge in the Fraser River at Tabernash, site 4, 1991-2000.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.