Laserfiche WebLink
treatments (weeks 1, 3, and 5) for those taxa which had significant p-values (a = 0.05) in <br />weighted ANOVA tests. Means for plankton densities were calculated on log(x+1) <br />transformed count data and then converted back into actual densities because of small sample <br />size and a negative binomial distribution (Elliot 1977). <br />RESULTS <br />Benthos <br />Nematode and the naupliar stages of copepods were the most abundant groups in the <br />benthos (Table 1). The densities of the major benthic taxa are within the range of previously <br />reported densities except for microcrustaceans (Mabey 1993, Wolz and Shiozawa 1995). Both <br />benthic copepods and cladocerans were found at higher densities than during a previous study <br />(Mabey 1993), and were more comparable to densities reported in that study for seasonally <br />inundated wetland areas near the river. At least four species of cyclopoid copepods were <br />present in the backwater benthos: EucyclQps s era , Euc c s nrionophorus, <br />Acanthocvclops vernalis, and Diacyclons bicus in datus, although A. vernalis and D. <br />bicuspidatus are in low numbers. At least 10 chironomid genera were collected in the benthos <br />over the period of our study: Chironomus, Glvptotendipes, CrDtochironomus, Polxpedilum, <br />Stempellinella. Nimbocera, Tan rsus, Lenziella, Tanypus, and Procladius. Only <br />Chironomus and Taus were abundant. We found two species of cladocerans present in the <br />benthos during our study: Ilvocaptus so di , and Macrothrix laticornis (Table 1). <br />Densities of naupliar and copepodite copepods were significantly lower (a = 0.05) in <br />the closed treatments than in control areas (Table 2), while the chironomid genus Tan us was <br />6