My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9544
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9544
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:27:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9544
Author
Collins, K., P. and D. K. Shiozawa.
Title
The Effects of Fish Predation on Backwater Invertebrate Communities of the Green River, Utah.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Provo, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
rom a ), and Colorado squawfish. Together these three species comprise 93 - 95% <br />of all backwater fishes (Haines and Tyus 1990). All three species consume <br />chironomid larvae, and the red shiner and young Colorado squawfish also consume <br />zooplankton, and semi-aquatic insects (Catherine A. Karp, personal communication). <br />METHODS <br />Study area <br />The Green River originates in Wyoming and is part of the Colorado River <br />drainage,joining the Colorado River in southeastern Utah. 404 km above its confluence <br />with the Colorado River it enters Ouray National Wildlife Refuge (ONWR). When it <br />reaches ONWR it has a drainage area of 47,723 km2 with an average high flow of <br />11,926 cfs and an average low of 3,530 cfs (U.S.G.S. data). All backwaters used in <br />this study were located on ONWR and were shallow (approximately 0.75 m to 1.0 m <br />deep) with no measurable current except when the wind blew. Secchi disk visibility <br />averaged 22 cm, and the substrate was composed of soft sediments under a thin <br />(approximately 4 cm) layer of flocculent material. <br />Experimental design <br />A randomized block design was used with three treatments per backwater. The <br />treatments were: (a) a four m2 (2 x 2 m) control area, marked by posts, which was <br />open for foraging to all backwater fishes, (b) a four m2 caged area that excluded all <br />fish, and (c) a four m2 cage with 2.5 cm wide by ten cm high (spaced approximately <br />ten cm apart) perforations cut into all four sides. These perforations excluded large <br />fish such as carp (Cyprinus carpio) and channel catfish (Italurus u a us) but <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.