My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9540
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:17:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9540
Author
Christopherson, K., G. J. Birchell and T. Modde.
Title
Larval Razorback Sucker and Bonytail Survival and Growth in the Presence of Nonnative Fish in the Stipprup Floodplain.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />impoundments in the lower Colorado River, albeit in the absence of nonnative fishes (Mueller et <br />al. 2003). However, if bonytail adults remain in floodplain depressions, temperatures exceed <br /> <br />20°C in early June and spawning would likely take place before or at the same time as nonnative <br />fishes. <br />Percent survival estimates for larval razorback sucker sympatric with nonnative fish were <br />low. The results and behavioral observations during the study support the conclusion of Johnson <br />~ et al. (1993) that larval razorback sucker are predator naive and unlikely to survive with high <br />numbers of nonnative fish. Razorback sucker larvae could frequently be observed swimming in <br />large groups in open water in the same vicinity as large predators. They did not appear to use the <br />~ available cover or avoid predators (Birchell and Christopherson 2004). This was also captured <br />with underwater video. <br />Survival of over 3,000 razorback suckers is encouraging. This is the first time larval <br />~ razorback sucker survival has been detected in the middle Green River since 1996 when Levee <br />Removal and associated studies began (Birchell et al. 2002; and Birchell and Christopherson <br />2004). If one applies the 56-72 percent survival reported in the 1999 study for 90 mm <br />~ razorback sucker (Birchell and Christopherson 2004), The Stirrup could have contributed 1,000 <br />to 2,000 sub-adult razorback suckers to the river population. However, caution should be used <br />projecting survival this way. <br />~ Small numbers of larval fish escaped from the enclosures, but it is impossible to <br />determine from which enclosure fish escaped. Escapement of larval fish from enclosures <br />reduced survival estimates. However, the population estimate for the razorback suckers outside <br />~ of the enclosures was relatively low (1,113). Because there were fewer predators outside the <br />enclosures it is assumed that survival for fish that escaped was better than for fish inside the <br />enclosures. Had those fish remained inside the enclosures survival estimates would have only <br />~ been slightly higher and the conclusions would have remained the same. <br />~ 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.