My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9540
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:17:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9540
Author
Christopherson, K., G. J. Birchell and T. Modde.
Title
Larval Razorback Sucker and Bonytail Survival and Growth in the Presence of Nonnative Fish in the Stipprup Floodplain.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DISCUSSION <br />It is important to note that this study was designed to evaluate larval razorback sucker <br />and bonytail survival in a natural floodplain depression. Natural in this case includes nonnative <br />fish predators and competitors. <br />The essence of the reset theory is the timing of larvae entering the floodplain. Age-0 <br />nonnative species did not appear for almost two weeks following endangered larval fish <br />i <br /> <br />introduction. It appears that endangered larval fish can withstand the predation from the ~ <br />relatively few adult non-native fish that enter the floodplain at connection. Past experience has <br />suggested that they cannot withstand the predation present when they enter floodplains that <br />contain large numbers and multiple cohorts ofnon-native fish that over-wintered (Birchen and ~ <br />Christopherson 2004). <br />Zooplankton peaks occurred shortly after the floodplain filled allowing for optimum food <br />availability with minimal inter-species competition. Thus, when the greatest concentration of ~ <br />zooplankton was available, little inter-species competition existed and growth rates <br />approximated 1 mm/d. With the fast growth start, larval endangered fish were able to maintain a <br />size advantage over many nonnative fish young-of--year spawned in the site. ~ <br />Size was also likely a major factor in avoiding predation. The larval endangered fish <br />were able to grow fast enough to avoid predation by the numerous age-0 non-native predators. <br />Conversely, in the study by Birchen and Christopherson (2004), multiple age classes of non- ~ <br />native predators, which included juvenile black bullhead and green sunfish, likely predated <br />heavily on endangered larval fishes. <br />The timing of the larval introduction was similar to their natural appearance in <br />floodplains. Razorback sucker spawn on the ascending limb of the hydrograph and are among <br />the first fish in this system to spawn each spring. Larvae drift into floodplains as they are <br />connecting with the river (Modde et al. 2001). Bonytail spawn and recruit in floodplain <br />16 ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.