Laserfiche WebLink
continuous reach map. Each line segment (arc) and enclosed polygon was assigned attributes <br />according to what they represent on the map. An eddy in a flow pattern map, for example, is an <br />enclosed polygon consisting of several arc segments. The segments were attributed as eddy <br />fence or shoreline substrate type. The polygon. itself was attributed according flow conditions <br />such as recirculating, stagnant, or downstream flow (Fig. 4). Lengths of arcs and areas of <br />polygons were calculated, and tables containing lengths, areas and attributes were exported into a <br />spreadsheet application for manipulation. Final maps were created and printed using ArcView <br />,-°-~~ <br />software. <br />C/zannel Cross-Sections <br />Twenty-two channel cross-sections were established in the 4 study reaches. Cross- <br />E~ sections were used to characterize channel geometry, identify bed material, help characterize <br />geomorphic variability within and between reaches, and to establish long-term channel <br />monitoring sites. Five to 6 cross sections were surveyed at about 1.6 km intervals within each of <br />~ the 4 study reaches. These cross sections were established in 1995 at approximately bankfull <br />discharge using a geodetic total station and depth-recording echo sounder. Cross-sections were <br />located near river mile markers located by Belknap (1994), so as to create a systematic sample of <br />channel types and bed materials. Waves in rapids cause many difficulties in measuring the bed, <br />so cross-sections were not surveyed in rapids. Cross-sections were established in small riffles, <br />zones of strong downstream flow, pools, and eddies. <br />Cross-section endpoints were monumented with either rebar or fence posts which were <br />pounded to depths such that about i 0-cm are exposed above ground surface. Transects were <br />measured by attaching alength-calibrated Kevlaz tag-line to the endpoints. The total station. was <br />used to measure ground-surface elevations under the tag line as well as water-surface elevation. <br />Depth of the bed was measured from a cataraft equipped with apaper-trace echo sounder and <br />outboard motor. The boat operator maintained the boat cazefully under the tag-line while slowly <br />crossing the river, and a second individual measured depth and tag-line position using the echo <br />sounder at the marked locations along the tag-line. At least 4 passes were made under the tag- <br />line, and points in the channel were also surveyed with a total station where wading was feasible. <br />Echo-sounder depths were compared with total station measurements to gage the accuracy of the <br />echo-sounder. Echo-sounder measurements concurred with total station measurements and <br />~ rarely deviated more than a few centimeters. Coordinate data from the total station was reduced <br />E<w to distance and elevations relative to endpoints. These data were combined with the average <br />depth recorded with the echo sounder at marked points under the tagline to create a complete <br />~° profile of the transect between the endpoints (Fig. 5) The standard deviation of the depths at <br />-.f each point was calculated and used as values for the determination of error. Errors were highest <br />where the bed had a steep slope toward the thalweg or where boulders were on the bed. These <br />errors are reported. as the error bars on plots ofcross-sections. <br />Photo Matching <br />`-" Archival searches were conducted to locate historical oblique photos taken in Desolation <br />and Gray Canyons which show the river and alluvial valley in past years. Once located, the <br />,, <br />A-6 <br />