My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9434
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9434
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:16:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9434
Author
Chart, T. E., K. L. Orchard, J. C. Schmidt, K. S. Day, K. D. Christopherson, C. Crosby and L. Lynch.
Title
Flaming Gorge Studies
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Reproduction and Recruitment of Gila Spp. and Colorado Pikeminnow in the Middle Green River.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c°. <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />The size and number oflow-velocity eddies that may be preferred habitat for the <br />endangered humpback chub (Gila cypha) in the Green-River in Desolation and Gray Canyons <br />changes with discharge and has changed since the early 1900Os. We determined the present <br />extent and distribution of these habitats by mapping low-velocity eddies at a scale of 1:5000 at 5 <br />or 6 discharges between 2,100 and 27,000 ft3/s in four 8-km reaches that are regularly sampled <br />by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. We also mapped the surficial geology of these <br />study reaches and the distribution of bed substrate that are emergent at 2000 ft3/s. We analyzed <br />the distribution of these areas within a geographic information system. The availability of <br />habitat prior to completion of Flaming Gorge Dam was estimated by matching old oblique <br />photographs, analyzing old aerial photos, and recomputing habitat availability prior to channel <br />change. <br />The total area oflow-velocity eddies, when summed for the 4 study reaches, does not <br />change with discharge, but the relative distribution of these eddies among the 4 study reaches <br />does change. Also, the type of eddies changes with discharge. At low discharge, the greatest <br />proportion of the total area oflow-velocity eddies occurs as small shoreline eddies, but the <br />greatest proportion occurs in a few large eddies at higher discharges. At low discharge, the river <br />bank is highly contorted and is dominantly bare sand and gravel. At high discharge, the river <br />bank has a simpler shape, and much of the shoreline is inundated vegetation. <br />The Green River channel is 19% narrower today than it was in the 19200s, and riparian <br />vegetation has established itself at low elevations and on formerly active mid-channel islands. <br />We estimate that the substrate of most nearshore habitats was sand or gravel prior to channel- <br />narrowing. <br />For purposes of developing flow recommendations, our results must be integrated with <br />the results of ecological studies which identify the relative importance of the different habitats in <br />the life history of the target species. <br />LIST OF KEY WORDS <br />Green River, geomorphology, flow, Desolation Canyon, Gray Canyon, habitat, Gila <br />4-' <br />A-viii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.