Laserfiche WebLink
<br />physical barriers to dispersal and seasonal migration. The importance of barriers to fish <br />movement will be discussed in connection with species-specific limiting factors. <br />~ The operation of reservoirs and other components of the water storage and distribution <br />system affects fish habitat by altering water depth, water velocity, and sediment load, <br />properties that are critical for the creation and maintenance of fish habitat. The <br />quantitative hydrodynamic connection between flow alterations and loss of fish habitat <br />in the main channel is poorly understood, with the notable exception of work on <br />~ Colorado pikeminnow spawning habitat (Harvey et al. 1993). The relationships are <br />complex and probably better to explore in the context of needs for speck life history <br />stages (e.g., nursery backwaters for larval pikeminnow). <br />The operation of reservoirs also has had some effect on temperatures in the rivers. <br />Reservoirs store cold meltwater in spring and, even though the surface layer of each <br />~ reservoir will warm during the summer, the release of water from near the bottom of <br />each reservoir will yield cold water through much of the summer. The result is a <br />depression of water temperatures below reservoirs during the months when the native <br />fishes have spawned historically. Colder temperatures could affect spawning as well as <br />the growth and survival of young larvae in the drift (Berry 1988). The association <br />~ between water temperature and initiation of spawning is relatively well known for the <br />Colorado pikeminnow (Tyus and Karp 1989, Tyus 1990), but less so for the other <br />species. <br />Lower temperatures may have implications for other life history stages, but less is <br />~ known, and some of the research results seem contradictory. Early lab studies <br />provided information about preferred temperatures of young life history stages of <br />Colorado pikeminnow, from hatching success to optimum temperatures for growth of <br />young of the year (Hamman 1981, Black and Bulkley 1985, Marsh 1985, Bozek et al. <br />1984). Studies also were done to determine how temperature changes might affect <br />~ survival and behavior of young fishes (e.g., Berry 1988, Childs and Clarkson 1996). <br />Findings of these laboratory studies have been applied to the river system with varying <br />results. For example, Kaeding and Osmundson (1988) used main channel <br />temperatures to evaluate habitat suitability for Colorado pikeminnow. More recent <br />studies have shown that endangered fishes in riverine habitat may not select the <br />temperatures conditions predicted as optimal by laboratory studies (e.g., spawning <br />~ temperatures for razorback sucker: Tyus and Karp 1989, 1990). <br />One factor that may mitigate the effect of lower temperatures is the capacity of all life <br />history stages to move toward suitable temperatures in the river. Young pikeminnow <br />can and do move between habitats such as backwaters, eddies, and main channel <br />~ shorelines in response to differences in temperature regime (e.g., Valdez et al. 1982, <br />Tyus 1991 b). Adult pikeminnow and razorback suckers use a wide range of off-channel <br />habitats such as semi-isolated backwaters, gravel pits, and cut-off side channels, and <br />they may move into shallow, flooded habitats in spring (Wick et al. 1983, Tyus 1987 <br />and 1990, Tyus and Karp 1990). It is thought that active selection of a preferred <br />25 <br /> <br />