Laserfiche WebLink
<br />however, almost all fish that moved, oriented to the chemical to which they had been <br />exposed, and presumably imprinted, as larvae. <br />~ Razorback suckers in the UCR basin spawn in spring, when flows are increasing and <br />water temperatures in the main channel are about 14-15°C (Tyus 1987, Tyus and Karp <br />1990), but there appears to be some plasticity in both timing and temperature (Hinckley <br />et al. 1991). Early in the spawning season, razorbacks congregate in flooded <br />shorelines, flooded bottomlands and gravel pits, and in the mouths of tributary streams. <br />~ These areas, which are probably used for staging, resting, or feeding, have higher <br />temperatures (mean: 19.6, range: 17.5-21 C; Tyus and Karp 1990) than the main <br />channel, and the warmer conditions may enhance maturation of gametes or othervvise <br />prepare the fish for reproductive activities. <br />There has been some controversy in the literature about the habitat that razorback <br />~ suckers select for spawning (see Hinckley et al. 1991 for review)., The issue is <br />sign cant because it provides part of the justification for major investments by the RIP <br />for acquisition of bottomlands. The typical spawning substrate for catostomids consists <br />of gravel or cobble (Breder and Rosen 1966). This is true of suckers in the western US <br />(Moyle 1976), including obligate lacustrine suckers that ascend streams to spawn on <br />~ gravels and cobbles (Scoppertone and Vinyard 1991). The razorback sucker conforms <br />to the general catostomid pattern: it deposits eggs in flowing water over substrate that is <br />predominantly gravel or cobble (reviewed by Hinckley et al. 1991). Even in Lake <br />Mohave, spawning adults aggregate over areas of coarse substrate (cobble mixed w~h <br />gravel), and the spawning fish sweep away fine materials before creating the <br />~ depressions in which the eggs are deposited. There is no indication that razorback <br />suckers deposit eggs over flooded vegetation in Lake Mohave, nor is it likely that they <br />will do so in flooded bottomland where the substrate may be vegetated or composed of <br />fine material. Except for induced spawning of captive fish in hatchery ponds (e.g., <br />Dexter NFH, Dexter, NM), catostomids do not deposit eggs over vegetation or fine <br />~ substrate. <br />Confusion about the sites chosen by razorback suckers for egg deposition may be due <br />in part to the extended period of time during which the females remain ripe. It has been <br />speculated that razorback suckers spawn in silty backwaters, flooded pasture, river <br />oxbows, and flooded bottomlands (Valdez et al. 1982, Osmundson and Kaeding 1991). <br />~ To be sure, razorback suckers in an advanced reproductive state (tuberculate with <br />expressible sex products) have been found in habitats of that kind, leading to the logical <br />conclusion that egg deposition also occurs there. However, egg deposition has not <br />been observed in those habitats, and it would not be expected based on the <br />reproductive biology of that or related species. Amore likely explanation is that the fish <br />~ used those habitats for staging, and that the advanced reproductive state was a <br />misleading clue. Because razorback suckers remain ripe for a long time, ripe fish <br />captured in the staging area would still have time to move into the main channel and <br />spawn over coarse substrate; this behavior has been documented previously (McAda <br /> <br />20 <br />• <br />