Laserfiche WebLink
population sizes needed to maintain populations of domestic animals or captive <br />populations for a number of generations have been determined, minimum population <br />sizes needed to maintain wild species are less well understood. Target population <br />sizes for populations of the endangered big-river fishes used in this document were <br />provided by the Colorado River Fishes Recovery Team and accepted by USFWS. <br />These population numbers represent the best professional judgement and fall within the <br />range of "...several thousand to 10,000..." thought to provide minimum viable <br />population sizes to sustain wild populations (reviewed by Thomas 1990). However, <br />more specific population targets are being developed for portions of the upper Colorado <br />River basin (e.g., Crowl and Bouwes 1997). At present these target sizes are <br />preliminary and have not been accepted by USFWS. Recovery plans can be updated <br />as necessary when final population targets are developed and accepted. It is <br />anticipated that it will take several years before such numbers are finalized. Although <br />population targets must be based on genetic requirements, they also must consider <br />how the population viability of wild populations are affected by existing conditions and <br />how they might be threatened by new changes. <br />Ecosystem RecoverX <br />The USFWS and NMFS (1994) has identified ecosystem recovery as an integral part of <br />endangered species recovery program and the USFWS funded preparation of a draft <br />multi-species recovery plan for the Colorado River fishes in 1996. This multi-species <br />plan is preliminary and has not been approved by the Colorado River Fishes Recovery <br />Team. However, it is assumed that a multispecies or ecosystem recovery plan will <br />eventually be forthcoming. <br />Critical habitat designation will play an important role in maintaining the natural <br />ecosystem. However, as important as critical habitat determination and management <br />has been as a recovery tool, there is still a need for management of the riverine <br />ecosystem due to widespread, continuing anthropogenic changes. Single species <br />recovery remains important, but continuing habitat change and the complexity of <br />riverine ecosystems suggest that recovery of the endangered Colorado River fishes <br />should also include a more holistic approach. <br />34 <br />