Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Funnel-type wire traps of 1 in chicken wire approximately 1.5 ft in <br />diameter by 2 ~ ft long were set among large boulders or accumulations <br />of debris. <br />Compact, durable, time efficient equipment was procured to collect <br />physical and chemical data. This included the Marsh-McBirney Model 201 <br />portable water velocity meter, a direct-readout device. Water velocity <br />measurements were taken at 0.6 distance from the surface. Water depths <br />were recorded with a collapsible stadia rod and a Lowrance depth finder <br />(Model LRG 1510A). <br />Total dissolved solids, salinities and conductivities were measured <br />with a Yellow Springs Meter (Model 33) which had a combined conductivity <br />and temperature probe. Conductivity was expressed as micromhos per <br />centimeter. Salinity was temperature compensated and recorded in grams <br />per kilogram. A Hach colorimeter (Model DR/1) was used to measure <br />dissolved oxygen and turbidity. Turbidites were measured in forazin <br />turbity units (FTU) which are equivalent to Jackson turbidity units. <br />No single technique efficiently sampled all habitats for all sizes <br />and species of fish. Every attempt was made to use gear or combinations <br />of gear that would provide a good cross-section of the fish population <br />in each habitat. The gear most utilized were seines. While a variety <br />of seine sizes and meshes were used, '~ in mesh nets were used predominantly. <br />Seines were hung with double weighted lead lines so they would stay <br />on the bottom in all anticipated current velocities. The catch per <br />effort was measured by the number of fish captured in a given area, <br />i.e., length of seine multiplied by the distance pulled. <br />Several boat sizes were used but the unit that was the best adapted <br />to general river use was a 16 ft (4.9m) flat bottom boat powered with a <br />25-hp outboard. The turbulent sections were traversed .with 18 ft (S.Sm) <br />rubber rafts. <br />Special Investigations <br />Abundance and Distribution of Young Colorado squawfish <br />The Vernal Field office initiated a special investigation in the <br />late summer-early fall of 1979 to obtain information about early life <br />history of Colorado squawfish. Directed toward "f illing in" needed <br />information not obtained by the standardized sampling program,-this <br />special effort was designed to evaluate the distribution and abundance <br />of young-of-the-year (YOY) Colorado squawfish. Collections were made <br />from RM 363 (KM 581) at the upstream end of Dinosaur National Monument <br />and extended to RM 22 (KM 35.2) near the confluence of the Green and <br />Colorado Rivers. <br />Due to limited manpower, a knowledge of young squawfish behavior <br />(based on field work and information from others) was applied in developing <br />a sampling program. In 1979, all backwaters encountered were sampled. <br />In 1980, a limited sampling of shoreline habitat near the sampled backwaters <br />