Laserfiche WebLink
REGULATIONS, LAWS, AND PERMITS <br />twill be necessary to utilize <br />Federal and State regulations, <br />laws, and permits to contain and <br />prevent further spread of the zebra <br />mussel. However, it has been stated <br />that present Federal and State regula- <br />tions do not adequately protect the <br />environment from the introduction of <br />exotic species, and that the roles of <br />various Federal and State agencies <br />should be redefined (Kurdila 1988; <br />U.S. Congress, Office of Technology <br />Assessment 1993). Although the use of <br />statutes, regulations and permits will <br />need further investigation and <br />evaluation with respect to zebra mussel <br />control that is beyond the scope of this <br />report, some existing measures are <br />pertinent and applicable: <br />Federal statutes- The zebra mussel <br />was designated a species of injurious <br />wildlife on Apri127, 1992 (57 FR <br />16876). The mussel, therefore came <br />under the authority of the Lacy Act by <br />this designation, and it was added to <br />the list of injurious fish, mollusks, and <br />crustaceans (50 CFR 16.13). As part of <br />this action, the Service prohibits <br />importation of live zebra mussels or <br />viable eggs into the United States or <br />any territory or possession of the <br />United States. Thus, the Lacy Act <br />prohibits transport of this species into <br />the United States from Canada. The <br />U.S., and perhaps Canadian border <br />~, agents, should be required to inspect <br />all boats, water carriers, etc. for the <br />presence of zebra mussels, and to <br />disseminate information which states <br />that it is illegal under the provisions of <br />the Lacy Act to transport zebra mussels <br />into or out of the United States. It is <br />also important that all Federal agencies <br />~ comply with the intent of the Lacy <br />Act, i.e., not to allow activities that <br />would result in the proliferation or <br />i <br />~ transport of injurious species. <br />State Laws -Many States already <br />have laws that apply to zebra mussels <br />State laws regulate the taking and <br />transport of fish & game, and regulate <br />fishing and aquaculture by issuing <br />permits, licenses and proclamations. In <br />addition, State laws also regulate <br />agricultural products and nuisance <br />species which affect agricultural <br />production. <br />Federal, state, and private fish <br />hatcheries are inspected to determine if <br />certain pathogens are present. It will <br />be necessary to monitor for the <br />presence of zebra mussels and to <br />include zebra mussels on the list of <br />species to be excluded at all fish- <br />rearing facilities. A certification of <br />"zebra mussel free" status should be <br />required before fish from these facilities <br />can be placed into uninfected areas. It <br />would also seem prudent to quarantine <br />all shipments of aquatic species <br />received in hatcheries that come from <br />infected regions of the country. These <br />shipments should be inspected for <br />zebra mussels (and perhaps other <br />species) and destroyed if necessary. <br />