My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9539
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9539
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:40:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9539
Author
Trammell, M., S. Meismer and D. Speas.
Title
Nonnative Cyprinid Removal in the Lower Green and Colorado Rivers, Utah.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />adults to portions of habitats, and manipulation of flow regimes. This study explored the mechanical <br />~ control methodology for nonnative cyprinids proposed in Lentsch et al. (1996). <br />The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility of reducing the abundance of nonnative <br />cyprinids from the lower Colorado and Green rivers in Utah to benefit native fishes, primarily Colorado <br />pikeminnow and razorback sucker. Enhancement of growth and survival of native fishes was the desired <br />outcome of removal efforts. <br />1.1 Objectives and Hypotheses <br />Our specific objective for this study was to remove nonnative cyprinids from habitats within a 50-mile river <br />reach in the lower Green River in Utah, and from three, 10-mile reaches in the Colorado River in Utah. <br />We sought to reduce cyprinid abundance from pre-runoff throughout summer months at two spatial <br />scales, i.e., at backwater and river reach levels. <br />The working hypotheses of this study were: <br />~ 1) Cyprinid removal by seining all backwaters in a river reach will deplete cyprinid <br />abundance at a backwater level. <br />2) Cyprinid removal by seining all backwaters in a river reach will deplete cyprinid <br />abundance at a reach level. <br /> <br />3) Cyprinid removal by seining all backwaters in a river reach will shift the species <br />composition. <br />4) Fall YOY ISMP sampling will be able to detect changes in cyprinid abundance (backwater <br />~ and reach levels) and species composition from cyprinid removal the previous spring. <br />5) Exclusion of nonnative cyprinid adults from portions of flooded tributaries will increase <br />available area for larval native fishes and reduce area available for nonnative cyprinids. <br />2.0 METHODS <br />2.1 Study Area <br />Removal efforts were conducted in portions of the lower Green and Colorado rivers (Figure 1). <br />On the Green River, habitats were treated within a 50-mile reach from the Dry Lake/School Bus Wash <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.