My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9539
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9539
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:40:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9539
Author
Trammell, M., S. Meismer and D. Speas.
Title
Nonnative Cyprinid Removal in the Lower Green and Colorado Rivers, Utah.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />At least 40 nonnative fish species occur in the Upper Colorado River basin (UCRB) (Nesler ~ <br />2003). Along with habitat modification, negative interactions of nonnative fishes are considered a major <br />cause of the decline of native species in the UCRB (Behnke and Benson 1983; Stanford and Ward 1986; <br />Carlson and Muth 1989; Bestgen 1990; Minckley 1991; Hawkins and Nesler 1991; Carlson and Muth ~ <br />1993, Lentsch et al. 1996). Nonnative fishes that inhabit the UCRB include piscivorous gamefish species <br />(e.g. northern pike Esox lucius, channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus, largemouth bass Micropterus <br />salmoides, smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu), and smaller cyprinid species (e.g., red shiner ~ <br />Cyprinella lutrensis, sand shiner Notropis stramineus, and fathead minnow Pimephales promelas). All <br />nonnative species may negatively impact native populations through competition, predation, or both <br />mechanisms (Hawkins and Nesler 1991, Lentsch et al. 1996, Tyus and Saunders 1996, Tyus and ~ <br />Saunders 2000). <br />It is likely that the nonnative cyprinid (NNC) species impact early life stages of native species due <br />to their prevalence in habitats used by larval and young-of-year (YOY) native fishes (Tyus et al. 1982, , <br />McAda et al. 1994a, and Trammell et al. 1999a, and 1999c). Where distributions overlap, predation may <br />be a significant cause of mortality in larval fishes (Pepin 1988, Bestgen 1997, Bestgen et al. 1998). <br />Ruppert et al. (1993) established that red shiner preyed on fish larvae in the Yampa and Green rivers in <br />Colorado. The susceptibility of early life stages of native fishes to predation and competition has thus <br />been a concern to researchers and was the main impetus for nonnative cyprinid removal projects in the <br />UCRB (Beyers et al. 1994, Muth and Snyder 1995). <br />The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Program) has identified control <br />of nonnative species as a necessary component of the recovery plan and has been conducting nonnative <br />fish control experiments since 1993 (Pat Nelson, personal communication). Management primarily <br /> <br />involves some form of active removal, a method suggested by Minckley (1991) as a means to enhance ~ <br />native fish survival in the UCRB. Lentsch et al. (1996) examined life histories of all nonnative species <br />within the UCRB and proposed possible means for their control. The suggested control methodology for <br />nonnative cyprinids included mechanical removal by seining in low-velocity habitats, blocking access of ~ <br />-1- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.