Laserfiche WebLink
<br />were blo <br />cked with fine mesh seines to allow the complete removal offish from a small area. A <br />maximum of three sections were blocked out in each backwater using large (12.2m x 1.8m x <br />1.6mm) seines. Sections were 4-5 m wide and; where possible, stretched across the backwater. <br />Each section was initially seined once using the standard Interagency Standardized Monitoring <br />Program (ISMP) protocol, and all fish were identified and counted. Then successive passes were <br />made until no more fish were caught. <br />Sampling efficiency, or capture probability C(p), was expressed as a percentage, <br />approximately represented by the total number offish collected in the first seine haul divided by <br />the total fish present in the section. The data were analyzed using CAPTURE, a statistical <br />program that produces population estimates based on capture probabilities, generated from <br />capture/removal studies (White et al. 1982). Capture probabilities were generated for each fish <br />species collected, and for each sub-section. In addition to susceptibility to sampling gear, <br />sampling efficiency is affected by several factors including: mud depth and consistency, large <br />cobble/boulder substrates, debris, water depth and turbidity, and size of the backwater. Seining <br />difficulty in each section was rated from 1 (easy) to 6 (hard), and capture probabilities were <br />compared between each rating. A paired means test was used to compare the difference in <br />species' relative abundance between the first seine haul and the total present in the section. A <br />diversity index modified by Keefe and Bergersen (1977) was used to further test the difference in <br />~ species composition and relative abundance between the first haul and the total. <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />Geomorphology: Ouray <br />Nursery habitats occur in the lee of emergent bed- and barforms at base flows. Bank- <br />attached compound bars were the predominate barform and most consistent contributor to <br />available nursery habitat, and the most stable channel features. Within the 10 km study reach, the <br />location of the study and point bars was fixed, but the location of midchannel bars and the <br />thalweg was transient. Fourteen sites were consistently occupied bybank-attached compound <br />bars or point bars during the study period. The low-flow morphology of these deposits varied <br />greatly from year to year, but the location of these deposits changed little during this study. J. <br />Mayers (LTSU, pers. comm., 1995), determined that location of these deposits has changed little <br />since 1966. In addition to these spatially stable bars, there were many transitory mid-channel <br />bars. <br />The magnitude and duration of flood flows have yearly effects on total habitat <br />availability. The 1993 peak was moderately high (570 m3/s [20130 cfs]), and the 1994 peak was <br />low (330 m3/s [ 11650 cfs]). The total habitat availability in the 10 km reach after peak flow was <br />estimated from the video at comparable base flows of 45 m3/s (1590 cfs) for 1992, 1993 and <br />1994. In 1992, the total habitat area was 21700 m2, compared to 12361 m2 in 1963. In 1993, the <br />total habitat area had decreased from 19921evels to 19517 m2, but the area of deep habitat had <br />increased from 13220 to 17460 m2. In 1994, the total habitat area increased to 23624 mZ, but the <br />area of deep habitat decreased from 17460 to 3080 m2. <br />The response of individual geomorphic features and habitats to various flow regimes was <br />assessed on the study bar. Bank-attached compound bars with secondary channels which <br />viii <br />