Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LIST OF FIGURES (continued) <br />~ Figure 12. Relationship of total habitat azea to mean catch rate ofnon-native cyprinid <br />(CPE in #fish/100 mZ) in summer, fall and spring. Upper and lower nursery <br />habitat sections, Colorado River, 1992-1996 ............................ 42 <br />Figure 13. Colorado pikeminnow mean catch rates (CPE in #fish/100 mZ) in five habitat <br />~ types. Flooded Tributary (FT), Horseshoe vortex (HS), Migratory Sandwave <br />(MS), Scour Channel (SC) and Shoreline Eddy (SE). Colorado River nursery <br />habitat, Upper and lower sections, 1992-1996 ........................... 43 <br />Figure 14. Habitat use ofnon-native cyprinids in each of five habitat types. Flooded <br />~ Tributary (FT), Horseshoe vortex (HS), Migratory Sandwave (MS), Scour <br />Channel (SCj and Shoreline Eddy (SE). Colorado River nursery habitat, <br />Upper and lower sections, 1992-1996 . . ............................... 44 <br />Figure 15. Comparison of Colorado pikeminnow catch rates (CPE in #fish/100 m2) for <br />Interagency Standazdized Monitoring Program (ISMP) and Colorado River <br />nursery habitat (NH), 1992-1996 ..................................... 45 <br /> <br />Figure 16. Average total length (mm) of Colorado pikeminnow in the summer, spring and <br />fall, 1992-1997.Colorado River nursery habitat ......................... 46 <br />Figure 17. Length frequency histogram of total length (mm) of Colorado pikeminnow, <br />Colorado River nursery habitat, Upper and lower sections, 1992-1996 ....... 47 <br />Figure 18. Relationship of total length of Colorado pikeminnow to overwinter survival <br />~ based on the percent change in catch rates between fall and spring. Colorado <br />River nursery habitat, Upper and lower sections, 1992-1996 ............... 48 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />. vi <br />