My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8160
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8160
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:38:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8160
Author
Trammell, M. and T. Chart.
Title
Aspinall Studies
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Evaluation of Nursery Habitat Availability and Colorado Pikeminnow Young of Year Habitat Use, in the Colorado River, Utah, 1992-1996\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />LIST OF FIGURES <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 1. Study area for the Aspinall Unit Colorado River nursery habitat, 1992-1996 .. 31 <br />Figure 2. Hydrograph of the Colorado River, from the USGS gage #09180500, near <br />Cisco, Utah ......................................................32 <br />Figure 3. Examples of Flooded Tributary (FT) and Horseshoe Vortex (HS) habitat types <br />encountered during the Aspinall Unit Project nursery habitat study, Colorado <br />River,1992-1996 .................................................33 <br />Figure 4. Examples of Scour Channel (SC), Migratory Sandwave (MS), and Shoreline <br />Eddy (SE) habitat types encountered during the Aspinall Unit Project nursery <br />habitat study, Colorado River, 1992-1996 .............................. 34 <br />Figure 5. Relationship of spring peak runoff flows with total habitat availability in <br />summer, fall and spring, upper and lower nursery habitat sections, Colorado <br />River, 1992-1995 .................................................35 <br />Figure 6. Relationship of sampling flows with total habitat availability in summer, fall <br />and spring, upper and lower nursery habitat sections, Colorado River, <br />1992-995 .......................................................36 <br />Figure 7. Relationship of sampling flows with total habitat area and habitat area in five <br />habitat types. Flooded Tributary (FT), Horseshoe vortex (HS), Migratory <br />Sandwave (MS), Scour Channel (SC) and Shoreline Eddy (SE). Upper and <br />lower nursery habitat sections, Colorado River, 1992-1995. Each sampling <br />occasion is represented by one sampling flow. Flows are sorted from lowest <br />to highest .......................................................37 <br />Figure 8. Relationship of peak runoff flows to mean catch rate of Colorado pikeminnow <br />(CPE in #fish/100 m2) in summer, fall and spring. Upper and lower nursery <br />habitat sections, Colorado River, 1992-1996 ............................ 38 <br />Figure 9. Relationship of sampling flows to mean catch rate of Colorado pikeminnow <br />(CPE in #fish/100 mZ) in summer, fall and spring. Upper and lower nursery <br />habitat sections, Colorado River, 1992-1996 ............................ 39 <br />Figure 10. Relationship of total habitat area to mean catch rate of Colorado pikeminnow <br />(CPE in #fish/100 m2) in summer, fall and spring. Upper and lower nursery <br />habitat sections, Colorado River, 1992-1996 ............................ 40 <br />~ Figure 11. Relationship of peak runoff flows to mean catch rate ofnon-native cyprinids <br />(CPE in #fish/100 m2) in summer, fall and spring. Upper and lower nursery <br />habitat sections, Colorado River, 1992-1996 ............................ 41 <br /> <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.