My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8159
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8159
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:38:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8159
Author
Trammell, M. and T. Chart.
Title
Aspinall Studies
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Annual Assessment of Colorado Pikeminnow Larval Production in the Colorado River, Utah 1992-1996 \
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(Notropis stramineus) and fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Since these three species <br />were difficult to distinguish in the larval stages they were combined into one ~~ategory for <br />analyses, and were collectively denoted asnon-native cyprinids (NNC). The other seven non- <br />native species, listed in Appendix B, were collected sporadically and collectively comprised from <br />0.0 to 6.75 % of the total number offish larvae (Table 1). <br />Species composition at Westwater revealed a higher percentage of nattive than non-native <br />fish species. (Table 1, and Figure 2). Gila spp. and bluehead sucker composed the majority of <br />native fish collections. Colorado pikeminnow larvae composed a small percent of the total <br />native fish even in 1993, when more Colorado pikeminnow larvae were collected (156) than all <br />three NNC species (96). In 1994, the lowest water year, the percentage of noii-native fish was <br />greater than native. <br />At Moab, the ratio of native to non-native fish species was reversed. The three non-native <br />cyprinids (NNC) dominated the catch, pazticulazly in 1994 when they compri;;ed 85% of the total <br />fish collected. Colorado pikeminnow were the most abundant native species in 1995 and 1996 <br />(Figure 3). <br />Table 1. Relative abundance offish species collected in the drift, Colorado Riiver, 1992 - 1996. <br />Year Total fish Colorado Other native Non-native Other non-native <br /> collected pikeminnow species cyprinids species <br /> <br />WESTWATER <br />1992 8512 1.01 82.86 16.13 0.0 <br />1993 4759 3.36 87.88 2.02 6.75 <br />1994 2003 1.25 31.35 64.20 3.20 <br />1995 670 4.18 69.85 25.22 0.75 <br />1996 1876 3.09 82.41 13.54 0.96 <br />MOAB <br />1992 4473 6.48 23.30 67.34 2.88 <br />1993 4101 3.41 33.07 58.89 4.63 <br />1994 3450 0.81 8.84 85.13 5.22 <br />1995 2573 13.91 21.30 63.16 1.63 <br />1996 2575 18.37 21.32 58.76 1.55 <br />1996 day 2682 17.23 10.92 70.66 1.19 <br />Annual Colorado pikeminnow drift abundance <br />The annual timing and duration of Colorado pikeminnow drift and spawning was <br />documented. Larval pikeminnow were collected each yeaz at both sites (Table 2). Each year <br />sampling began one to two weeks before any Colorado pikeminnow were collected. The date the <br />first Colorado pikeminnow was collected vazied from the earliest on June 27 (1994) at Moab to <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.