Laserfiche WebLink
from yeaz to yeaz with varying flow scenarios, although cross-channel sampling was conducted <br />only in 1992 during that study. <br />We believe that the larger volume of water present in the Colorado River than the Yampa <br />River may affect distribution of larvae in the water column. The Colorado River at the Cisco <br />gage carved approximately 5 times the volume of water the Yampa carved in 1992 (based on <br />average July flow), and from 8 to 26 times as much for the other 4 years of the study. If the <br />assumption of even distribution throughout the water column is in error, the estimated catch rate <br />in # fish/hour corrected for river volume could be vastly over or under estimated since the <br />percent of total river volume sampled is quite small, from 0.0002% to 0.002%. Based on Yampa <br />River results, dawn, near-shore sampling is sufficient to determine relative abundances and peaks <br />in drifting pikeminnow larvae, but perhaps not to estimate the total numbers of pikeminnow <br />larvae produced. Nevertheless, we have used this method in this report to make our data <br />comparable to the concurrent Green River larval drift results (Bestgen et al. 1998). <br />The post-hatch ages of the pikeminnow were calculated from total lengths, using <br />formulae developed by Haynes et al. (1985) and Muth (1990) (Appendix A2), which result in <br />slightly different ages. However, the Haynes et al (1985) formula was used for analysis. <br />Spawning dates were estimated by adding six days to the post-hatch ages (Bestgen et al. 1998, <br />Bestgen and Williams 1994). <br />Water temperatures were taken by the crews each morning at the drift sites. Daily water <br />temperatures are also recorded by the USGS at each gage. Temperatures were thought to affect <br />spawning behavior more than drift behavior. The USGS gage data might more accurately <br />characterize the main channel temperature, which affects spawning behavior, than near-shore <br />temperatures at dawn. Therefore the degree day accumulations and the date the river reached <br />18°C each year used in analyses were calculated from the USGS data. Degree day accumulations <br />were estimated from January 1 through each month, and to the estimated onset of spawning. <br />The strength of association between the variables of flow (magnitude of peak, and <br />average monthly flows), temperature (degree day accumulation and date the water temperature <br />reached 18°C), and collections of Colorado pikeminnow and non-native cyprinids (catch rates <br />and total transport abundance) were tested using Peazson's correlation coefficients. The <br />correlations between temperature, length of growing season, total length of Colorado <br />pikeminnow in the fall, and overwinter survival were tested, also using Peazson's correlation <br />coefficients. The nature of the data did not lend itself to more rigorous analysis. <br />RESULTS <br />Species composition and relative abundance <br />Five native and ten non-native fish species or taxa commonly found in the Colorado <br />River in this azea were collected in the drift net samples (Appendix B). Native species collected <br />include the endangered Colorado pikeminnow, as well as bluehead sucker (Catostomus <br />discobolus), flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis), and speckled dace (Rhinichthys <br />osculus). The three species of the native Gila taxon (presumably mostly roundtail chub G. <br />robusta) were not differentiated as larvae, and were counted as one. The most abundant non- <br />native species were the three common cyprinids: red shiner (Cyprinella lutrensis), sand shiner <br />3 <br />