Laserfiche WebLink
~ Invertebrates play an influential role in continuing the assimilation of potential <br />~ productivity into aquatic food webs. Aquatic invertebrates feed on periphyton, <br />• phytoplankton, and detritus, incorporating nutrients and biomass derived from the <br />floodplain into the riverine food web. Grazer, shredder, and filter feeding invertebrates <br />~ are in tum eaten by predatory invertebrates and fish, thus assimilating floodplain <br />~ productivity into the top levels of the food web (Fig. 1.1). <br />~ ~ Fish <br />~ ~ ,Invertebrates ~ <br />~ Detritus ~ <br />~ ~ i <br />~ Floodplain ~~ <br />~ Inundation ~ <br />~ ~ <br />Nutrients ~ Phytoplankton/ <br />r eri h on <br />• Figure 1.1 Food web of the middle Green River floodplain. <br />~ Zooplankton and aquatic invertebrate larvae are an important food resource to <br />~ juvenile fish. Therefore, the high density and diversity of invertebrate assemblages <br />• within floodplain habitats represents an augmented food resource to juvenile <br />endangered fish. Because of enhanced productivity of food organisms, floodplain <br />~ wetlands facilitate rapid fish growth and survival within the areas (Osmundson 1986) <br />~ and enhance fish survivorship and growth within the river system. Native young-of-the- <br />~ year (YOY) fish that leave the river and utilize floodplain wetlands should be larger than <br />• if they remained in the river. When these larger native fish enter the river they should <br />be less susceptible to predation by most nonnative fish in the main channel. Thus, it is <br />~ hypothesized that floodplain restoration will provide larval/juvenile endangered fish <br />~ access to high quality nursery habitat with enhanced food resources and favorable <br />• physical conditions that will enhance survivorship. These potential benefits could be <br />offset, however, by increased production of nonnative fish that also utilize floodplain <br />~ habitats. Successful establishment of nonnative fishes has already resulted in their <br />~ dominance in both the main channel (Day et al. 1999; Trammel and Chart 1999) and <br />• floodplain habitats (Modde 1997) of the Green River. Many nonnative species now <br />present in the Colorado River system are potentially very important as limiting factors to <br />~ native fish survivorship and recruitment. Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), northern <br />~ pike (Esox Lucius), walleye (Stizostedion vitreum), green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus), <br />~ and smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieur) all pose significant threats to native <br /> <br />1.4 <br />