Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />~~ <br />~ BACKGROUND <br />~ The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCRRP) was <br />established in 1988 to resolve conflict over competing demands for water in the upper <br />~ Colorado River basin. The UCRRP is a cooperative effort involving the states of <br />~ Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the U.S. Fish and <br />~ Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Western Area Power Administration, Colorado <br />• River Energy Distributors Association, water user organizations, and environmental <br />organizations. The dual purposes of the UCRRP are to recover four species of fish <br />~ listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, while <br />~ allowing the states to continue to develop water under the Colorado River compact. <br />• The UCRRP developed a Recovery Action Plan (RIPRAP} that lists actions <br />believed necessary to recover the bonytail (Gila elegans), humpback chub (Gila cypha), <br />~ Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius) and razorback sucker (Xyrauchen <br />~ texanus). One set of actions within the RIPRAP consists of restoring and protecting <br />• floodplain habitats to support and sustain species recovery. Levee Removal is one <br />effort undertaken by the Recovery Program to restore floodplain habitats for native fish <br />~ use. <br />n <br />~~ <br />~ Problem Statement <br />Floodplain habitats are reported to be important nursery and feeding areas for <br />~ razorback suckers and other native fishes (Wydoski and Wick 1998). The chronology <br />~ of spawning and larval emergence (Tyus and Karp 1990; Muth et al. 1998), as well as a <br />~ linkage between juveniles and floodplains (Modde 1996), indicate that floodplain <br />• habitats are important to early life stages of razorback sucker. However, since the <br />operation of Flaming Gorge Dam the frequency offloodplain-riverine connection has <br />~ been dramatically reduced. Reduced floodplain connection frequency has occurred <br />~ primarily because of reduced mean annual peak flow (672 m3/s [24,000 cfs) pre-dam to <br />• 487 m3/s [17,400 cfs) post-dam) and river bank stabilization resulting from vegetation <br />encroachment within the active river channel (Graf 1978, Flo-engineering 1996, 1997). <br />~ Construction of flood control levees has also contributed to reduced floodplain <br />~ connection frequency in some sections of the Green River. Flo-engineering (1997) <br />• reported the frequency offloodplain-riverine connection has decreased from occurring 2 <br />out of 3 years pre-dam to only 2 out of 7 years during the post-dam period. This <br />~ reduction of floodplain connection frequency has decreased or eliminated native fish <br />~ access to floodplain habitats. Thus, native fish no longer benefit from highly productive <br />~ floodplain habitats. <br />The influential role of floodplains in river ecology has made them the subject of <br />~ recent interest (Bayley 1995, Ligon et al. 1995, Townsend 1996). The annual <br />~ hydrologic cycle of a floodplain consists of a periodic cycle of inundation and recession, <br />~ typically associated with seasonal weather patterns. The general importance of <br />• floodplains and associated riparian communities to riverine ecosystems is a central <br />tenet of both the Flood Pulse Concept (Junk et al. 1989) and the River Continuum <br />~ Concept (Vannote et al. 1980). <br />~ The Flood Pulse Concept (Junk et al. 1989) argues that the majority of annual <br /> <br />1.2 <br />