Laserfiche WebLink
H <br />H <br />~ and green sunfish numbers increase fathead minnow numbers decline somewhat. <br />~ Some movement of non-native fish from the floodplain to the river did occur. However, <br />~ avast majority of non-native fish occupying the floodplain remained in the floodplain. <br />• Increases of non-native fish in the river were only observed when draining events <br />unrelated to removal of levees occurred. These increases did not persist between <br />~ seasons. <br />~ Native fish use of floodplain habitats was highly correlated with magnitude and <br />• duration of the spring flood. Native fish captures were highest during years of high <br />magnitude and long duration spring flows. Adult native fish species utilized floodplain <br />~ habitats during the connection period then returned the river during flow recession. <br />Flannelmouth suckers and Colorado pikeminnows were the most abundant native <br />• species caught in the floodplain. Razorback suckers were captured only occasionally. <br />However, this is likely due to the extremely low numbers of razorback suckers in the <br />~ river. Unlike non-native species, native species did not utilize the floodplain for <br />~ reproduction. Instead YOY native fish use is dependent on passive drift into the <br />• floodplain. Larval razorback, flannelmouth and bluhead suckers were caught drifting <br />into floodplain sites. However, survival of YOY fish was not detected during the study. <br />~ For floodplains to aid in recovery of razorback suckers several events must <br />~ occur. First, razorback suckers must spawn successfully and have larvae entrained in <br />~ the floodplain. Second, larvae must survive and grow within the environment of the <br />floodplain. Third, they must leave the floodplain and recruit into the river population. <br />~ Based on these life history events, a floodplain wetland that functions ideally in support <br />~ of razorback sucker recovery will have the following characteristics: 1) the site is <br />~ configured to maximize larval fish entrainment; 2) adequate cover to survive predation; <br />• 3) high productivity; 4) low numbers of non-native fish; 5) adequate water quality to <br />support fish year round; and 6) site is physically self sustaining. None of the floodplains <br />~ sampled fully meet these criteria. However, there are floodplain configurations that <br />~ support razorback sucker recovery better than others. Floodplains function in one of <br />• three basic classifications: <br />~ 1) Deep Depression Classification - In this scenario larval razorback suckers are <br />~ entrained in a site and remain for one or more growing seasons. After one or <br />• more growing seasons fish voluntarily leave the site during connection or could <br />be removed mechanically. <br />~ 2) Terrace Classification -Under this scenario larval razorback suckers drift into <br />~ and utilize the site temporarily during high flow then reenter the river during flow <br />~ recession. <br />3) Managed Site Classification -These are sites with control structures that can <br />~ be managed as either depression or terraces. <br />~ There are both positive and negative features for each classification. However, <br />• we believe depression sites (with or without control structures) that are configured to <br />allow water flow through, will likely contribute the most to immediate recovery and long <br />~ term sustainability of razorback suckers. Therefore, the following recommendations <br />~ were made: <br /> <br />xiii <br />