My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9389
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9389
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:34:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9389
Author
Birchell, G. J., K. Chrisopherson, C. Crosby, T. Crowl, J. Gourley, M. Townsend, S. Goeking, T. Modde, M. Fuller and P. Nelson.
Title
The Levee Removal Project
USFW Year
2002.
USFW - Doc Type
Assessment of Floodplain Habitat Restoration in the Middle Green River.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
H <br />H <br />~ and green sunfish numbers increase fathead minnow numbers decline somewhat. <br />~ Some movement of non-native fish from the floodplain to the river did occur. However, <br />~ avast majority of non-native fish occupying the floodplain remained in the floodplain. <br />• Increases of non-native fish in the river were only observed when draining events <br />unrelated to removal of levees occurred. These increases did not persist between <br />~ seasons. <br />~ Native fish use of floodplain habitats was highly correlated with magnitude and <br />• duration of the spring flood. Native fish captures were highest during years of high <br />magnitude and long duration spring flows. Adult native fish species utilized floodplain <br />~ habitats during the connection period then returned the river during flow recession. <br />Flannelmouth suckers and Colorado pikeminnows were the most abundant native <br />• species caught in the floodplain. Razorback suckers were captured only occasionally. <br />However, this is likely due to the extremely low numbers of razorback suckers in the <br />~ river. Unlike non-native species, native species did not utilize the floodplain for <br />~ reproduction. Instead YOY native fish use is dependent on passive drift into the <br />• floodplain. Larval razorback, flannelmouth and bluhead suckers were caught drifting <br />into floodplain sites. However, survival of YOY fish was not detected during the study. <br />~ For floodplains to aid in recovery of razorback suckers several events must <br />~ occur. First, razorback suckers must spawn successfully and have larvae entrained in <br />~ the floodplain. Second, larvae must survive and grow within the environment of the <br />floodplain. Third, they must leave the floodplain and recruit into the river population. <br />~ Based on these life history events, a floodplain wetland that functions ideally in support <br />~ of razorback sucker recovery will have the following characteristics: 1) the site is <br />~ configured to maximize larval fish entrainment; 2) adequate cover to survive predation; <br />• 3) high productivity; 4) low numbers of non-native fish; 5) adequate water quality to <br />support fish year round; and 6) site is physically self sustaining. None of the floodplains <br />~ sampled fully meet these criteria. However, there are floodplain configurations that <br />~ support razorback sucker recovery better than others. Floodplains function in one of <br />• three basic classifications: <br />~ 1) Deep Depression Classification - In this scenario larval razorback suckers are <br />~ entrained in a site and remain for one or more growing seasons. After one or <br />• more growing seasons fish voluntarily leave the site during connection or could <br />be removed mechanically. <br />~ 2) Terrace Classification -Under this scenario larval razorback suckers drift into <br />~ and utilize the site temporarily during high flow then reenter the river during flow <br />~ recession. <br />3) Managed Site Classification -These are sites with control structures that can <br />~ be managed as either depression or terraces. <br />~ There are both positive and negative features for each classification. However, <br />• we believe depression sites (with or without control structures) that are configured to <br />allow water flow through, will likely contribute the most to immediate recovery and long <br />~ term sustainability of razorback suckers. Therefore, the following recommendations <br />~ were made: <br /> <br />xiii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.