Laserfiche WebLink
f. Determine the response of riparian vegetation to levee removal, and the <br />effects on the above-mentioned responses. <br />3. Measure responses in manipulated sites. <br />a. Determine the importance of timing and duration of inundation to native and <br />nonnative fish production <br />b. Determine the effectiveness of different gears in capturing different life stages <br />of endangered fish (razorback suckers). <br />c. Determine the response of the river fish community (native and nonnative <br />species) following experimentation within the manipulated sites. <br />Sampling efforts were initiated in 1996 prior to levee removal and continued <br />through 1999. Levees were breached at 3 sites in 1997 and at an additional 5 sites in <br />1998. Breaches were cut to match pre-Flaming Gorge Dam flooding frequency (2 out <br />of 3 years). Most breaches were cut at the downstream end of floodplain sites. <br />However, this configuration did not maximize larval transport to the floodplain because <br />transport was limited to days of increasing river flows. To maximize larval entrainment <br />sites should be configured to allow water to flow through the site. <br />Physical, nutrient, water quality, primary productivity, secondary productivity, and <br />fish data were collected both within the floodplain sites and the adjacent river reaches. <br />Net Primary Productivity (NPP) in the Green River was lowest in April prior to spring <br />flooding, then increases through the summer until peaking in July. This pattern is <br />attributed to increased temperatures and light penetration that occurs during this period. <br />NPP in the floodplain followed this same pattem although rates were much higher. <br />Primary productivity was highest in the floodplain following connection with the river. <br />Because peak productivity in the floodplain occurs post-flood, and because of a <br />relatively short duration of connection, floodplain habitats may not be an important <br />source of primary productivity for the Green River. <br />The overall observed pattern for benthic invertebrate densities in the river is one <br />of decreasing density from pre- to post-flood. Benthic invertebrate densities were <br />higher in the river than the floodplain prior to and during spring flooding. Following <br />spring flooding densities were higher in the floodplain. Export rates of benthic <br />invertebrates from the floodplain were very low. For benthic invertebrates restored <br />wetlands represented sinks of biomass rather than sources. Conversely zooplankton <br />were exported from the floodplain at densities up to eight times those observed in the <br />river. Zooplankton densities were higher in floodplain than riverine habitats during the <br />entire pre- to post-flood sampling period. <br />Non-native fish dominated the fish assemblages in floodplain habitats comprising <br />over 98% of the total catch. Because fish populations persist year round in depression <br />sites non-native densities were higher in these sites than terrace sites. The trend for <br />depression sites is an initial increase of non-native cyprinids (mainly fathead minnows) <br />followed by increasing numbers of black bullheads and green sunfish. As bullheads <br />xii <br />