Laserfiche WebLink
- 12 - <br />Two field chiefs were in charge of the coordination of project <br />operations. Both men were fisheries biologists with considerable knowledge <br />and experience in stream treatment work and related problems. Their schedule, <br />throughout the project, was divided into 12-hour shifts, during which time <br />each maintained radio contact with the general progress of the treatment <br />program. The field chiefs were prepared to provide trouble-shooting or <br />emergency assistance for any field unit at any time. <br />The coordination and direction was handled by two operational <br />chiefs, the fisheries management supervisors for the states of Utah and Wyoming. <br />Qne of these men was to-make continual daytime reconnaissance flights over <br />the areas of activity while the other was to maintain surveillance of field <br />activities from an airboat. Their observations were to provide constant <br />checks on treatment progress and effectiveness, as well as an efficient look- <br />out for field problems and trouble spots. Because of the superiority of line <br />of sight, air-to-ground radio communication, the airplane could serve as a <br />mobile relay for ground-to--ground information. The lack of dependability of <br />ground radio communication because of the long distances and rough terrain <br />rnade this an important consideration. <br />While many of the vehicles from Utah and Wyoming were equipped with <br />two-way radios, the radio frequencies of the two states are different. For <br />expediency, several Utah radio units were changed to the Wyoming frequency. <br />All supervisory personnel were ..radio- equipped. A portable two-way unit <br />installed in the Wyoming Department airboat, was to provide direct contact <br />with boat and station operations. Several more portable units were to be <br />distributed to the vehicles involved in airboat and helicppter servicing. <br />Commissary trailer units were also equipped with radios to provide centralized <br />communications posts. <br />Once the scheduled details of the entire operation were formulated, <br />it was possible to prepare manpower rosters and make specific assignments for <br />every job. A descriptive, chronological outline was prepared for all project <br />activities, (Appendix A). Supplementing this were schematic charts of the <br />hour-to-hour responsibilities of all. supervisory and supporting personnel, <br />(Appendix B); and a lodging roster covering all personnel assignments, <br />(Appendix C). In addition to these general directions, specific work sheets <br />were prepared for each section chief and each station crew, (.Appendix D and E). <br />The sheets described, on an hour-to-hour basis, each individual's duties <br />for the entire project and listed immediate supervisors, special equipment <br />requirements and billeting. <br />Lodging and eating arrangements were prearranged so that all <br />personnel would be assured of these facilities. As the communities along <br />the Green River are many miles apart, it was necessary to arrange an auxiliary <br />feeding system for men on duty. Two small house trailers were equipped to <br />serve as field commissary units. These, stocked with a variety of soft drinks, <br />coffee, sandwiches and snack material, were assigned parking and travel schedules <br />to keep them continually near the fields of major activity (Appendix F). Each. <br />individual was supplied with a copy of the commissary schedule, lodging roster, <br />scherrtatic treatment outline and his individual work schedule. <br />As there seemed little doubt that many trout would be killed through- <br />out the upper sixty miles of the treatment area, two crews were assigned to <br />