My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6010
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
6010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:30:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
6010
Author
Binns, A., et al.
Title
The Planning, Operation, and Analysis of the Green River Fish Control Project.
USFW Year
1964.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
--~ <br />- lI - <br />The Mapping and Final .Location of Station Sites <br />As previously described, all the main streams of the project were <br />arbitrarily divided into ten-mile sections by map and photograph measurement, <br />During the summer of 1962, all thirty-eight station sites on the New Fork, <br />East Fork, Green, Big Sandy, Blacks Fork, and Henry's Fork Rivers were <br />exactly located in the field. .Fortunately, access throughout the project <br />area was sufficiently good to allow the stations to be placed very-close <br />to the planned ten-mile map points. Several of the station locations were <br />in very rough, remote country, requiring four-wheel drive truck equipment <br />and many hours of travel time.' To provide a comprehensive picture of trans- <br />portation problems, all distances to station sites were measured, timed, and <br />checked for vehicle-type requirements. A list of the highway distances <br />between station access roads was provided to project personnel. <br />Because much of the project's operation would be at night and most <br />of the participating personnel were totally unfamiliar with the Green River <br />drainage, it was necessary for efficiency and safety, that each individual <br />in supervisory capacity be relatively familiar with the station sites for <br />which he would be responsible. All supervisory personnel were conducted over <br />their assigned areas and familiarized with roads and identifying land marks. <br />As additional guidance aids, large marker arrows were placed at all main <br />turn-off points and questionable junctions. These arrows were painted a <br />bright, fluorescent orange and each had a reflective point to facilitate <br />night work. Each arrow also showed a large, black number corresponding to <br />the number of the station to which it pointed. Further assistance was <br />provided by a field map showing the general location, access, and number <br />for each station. Copies of this map were distributed to all personnel other <br />than the two-man station crews (Figure 9). <br />Personnel Organization and Servicing Arrangements <br />On a project of this size, it seemed advisable to organize all <br />personnel on a semi-military plan (Figure 10). Careful timing and coordina- <br />tion were essential in order to have "the assigned people doing the right <br />jobs in the proper places at the scheduled times." The Green River proper <br />was divided into four sections determined largely by general accessibility. <br />Section One included stations 1 through 5 and tributaries; Section Two, <br />stations 6 through 10; Section Three, stations 11 through 16; and Section <br />Four, stations 17 through 22. The stations in each. section were placed <br />under the direction of two experienced fisheries biologists assigned as <br />day and night section foremen. Their responsibilities included placement <br />of the two-man station crews on site, initiation of station flows, and <br />maintenance of planned time schedules. <br />Four assistant field chiefs, two far day and two for night shifts, <br />were assigned over the section foremen in total responsibility. These were <br />experienced fisheries biologists intimately familiar with the entire <br />project area. They were equipped with mobile two-way radio units and their <br />duties related to project coordination, assistance and advice to operating <br />field units, and liaison between field chiefs and all operational activities, <br />z <br />,~„~ ~~~r~. ..,..~~~ ~„ „~~ ,.,~.~o._,~,.m ~._-_- _ _ . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.