Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />of the three study species have declined. Roundtail chubs and flannelmouth suckers were <br />historically common in headwater streams and mainstem rivers throughout the CRB. <br />Bluehead suckers historically occurred in mainstem and tributary habitats downstream to <br />the mouth of Grand Canyon. <br />Roundtail chubs now occupy approximately 45% of their historical range in the CRB <br />(roughly 30 and 55% of historical lower and upper CRB habitats, respectively}. <br />Flannelmouth suckers occupy approximately 45% of their historical range in the CRB <br />(roughly 25 and 50% of historical lower and upper CRB habitats, respectively). Bluehead <br />suckers occupy approximately 50% of historical CRB habitat (roughly 60 and 45% of <br />historical lower and upper CRB habitats, respectively}. <br />We identified 15, 14, and 12 ~pulations of roundtail chub, flannelmouth sucker, and <br />Bluehead sucker in the CRB, respectively. Population designations are likely to change <br />with further analyses of abundance, movement patterns, and genetic information, <br />identification of additional collection localities, repatriation of skies to historical <br />habitats, and removal of migration barriers. <br />Like the four federally endangered fish, roundtail chub, flannelmouth sucker, and <br />Bluehead sucker appear to have declined due to reservoir construction and operation, and <br />invasion of non-native fish species. However, the study skies have persisted in some <br />locations where the four endangered, big-river fish did not, in part perhaps because of <br />adaptive life history traits and use of smaller tributary systems. Several Colorado River <br />Basin states currently provide protection for the three species, and a conservation plan is <br />in its formative stages. <br />Final Report September 2002 <br />iv <br /> <br />