Laserfiche WebLink
abundance without facilitating or inhibiting feeding due to super-abundance or <br />scarcity of food. <br />The number of zooplankton introduced into aquaria was not adjusted to <br />account for mortality of fish because small size and rapid deterioration of <br />dead fish made accurate counting difficult. Zooplankton abundance within <br />aquaria was not measured. Inspection of aquaria showed that living <br />zooplankton did not accumulate in any of the experimental treatments. <br />The experiment was concluded 1 h after the second feeding on day 14. <br />Surviving fish were removed from aquaria, sacrificed by administering an <br />overdose of anesthesia (tricaine methanesulfonate, Argent Chemical <br />Laboratories, Redmond, Washington), and preserved in 10 % formalin. Preserved <br />fish were sorted by species, counted, blotted, and their wet mass was <br />determined (± 1 mg). <br />Five Colorado squawfish and five fathead minnow were randomly selected <br />from each replicate for diet analysis. Guts (from esophagus to vent) were <br />removed by dissection. No evidence of regurgitation of gut contents was <br />observed. Gut contents were examined under magnification, and individual food <br />items were identified and enumerated by categories: cladocera, copepods, <br />rotifers, or nauplii. <br />Statistical analysis <br />The response of relative growth (r), where r = (w2 - w~)/w~ and w~ and w2 <br />are mass at beginning and end of the experiment, was used to infer effects of <br />competition. Survivorship was measured, but the experiment duration was too <br />short to permit its use for study of competitive effects because non-feeding <br />fish could have remained alive via internal energy reserves. Data were <br />9 <br />