Laserfiche WebLink
that interference from ciliated epithelial cells was greater in <br />toxicant-exposed fish compared to controls. Therefore, the <br />systematic survey should have prevented introduction of <br />investigator bias. <br />Discussion <br />A variety of methods have been used to evaluate effects of <br />potential contaminants on olfaction of fishes, coincidently, the <br />level of biological organization used to assess adverse effects <br />has varied (Sutterlin 1974; Brown et al. 1982; Hara et al. 1983; <br />Brand and Bruch 1992; Klaprat et al. 1992). Biochemical studies <br />have suggested mechanisms responsible for toxicant effects and <br />provided insight into the dynamics of toxification at the <br />subcellular level. Histopathological and electron microscopy <br />studies have provided evidence of toxicant-induced injury at the <br />cellular level. Electrophysiology studies have demonstrated <br />effects at the cellular and organ level, and behavioral studies <br />have studied effects at the level of the individual. With <br />exception of electrophysiological studies, experimental <br />techniques that operate at sub-individual levels of biological <br />organization infer olfactory inhibition by observation of <br />structural changes in olfactory tissues; however, severity of <br />structural changes may not reflect degree of inhibition of <br />olfactory function. Electrophysiological studies measure <br />olfactory function, but they do not allow the organism to <br />13 <br />