My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9556
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9556
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:28:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9556
Author
Bestgen, K. R., K. A. Zelasko and C. T. Wilcox.
Title
Non-native fish removal in the Green River, Lodore and Whirlpool canyons, 2002-2006, and fish community response to altered flow and temperature regimes, and non-native fish expansion.
USFW Year
2007.
USFW - Doc Type
115,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lived adults, but reproduction is often reduced or eliminated by cold spring and summer water <br />temperatures and other effects of regulation. <br />In the regulated reach of the Green River downstream from Flaming Gorge Dam, native <br />fishes are affected both by expanding populations of non-natives fishes and by altered flows and <br />thermal regimes. Flow and temperature regimes in the Green River have recently been re- <br />regulated at Flaming Gorge Dam for the benefit of native fishes downstream (Muth et al. 2000, <br />Record of Decision, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, 2006). Protocols used for river restoration <br />embraced re-establishment of natural physical processes in streams with hypothesized benefits <br />for native biota, including fishes (Stanford et al. 1996, Poff et al. 1997). Re-establishment of <br />annual flow maxima to maintain channel geomorphology and flood plain connectedness, <br />reduction of base flow fluctuations to enhance stability and food web functioning of low velocity <br />nearshore areas, and restoration of more natural seasonal temperature patterns are examples of <br />key processes that may facilitate recovery of native biota (Stanford et al. 1996, Poff et al. 1997). <br />However, re-regulated flow and thermal regimes may also influence non-native fish populations <br />in affected reaches and may result in uncertainty about whether such management actions <br />provide a net positive benefit for native fishes (Propst and Gido 2004, Bestgen et al. 2006). For <br />example, it is difficult to isolate effects of flow or temperature regimes on native fishes when <br />distribution and abundance of invasive species are expanding, perhaps through interactions with <br />variable environmental conditions (Bestgen et al. 2006). Thus, a main challenge of testing river <br />restoration hypotheses is linking population measurements such as fish abundance to a driving <br />variable or set of flow or temperature variables with reasonable certainty, while also considering <br />the potentially large effect that non-native predaceous fish populations may have on native <br />fishes. <br />~'he goal of this study is to report on non-native fish removal efforts in the Green River in <br />Lodore and Whirlpool Canyon. We examine trends in distribution and abundance of selected <br />non-native fishes, from 2002-2004 (Bestgen et al. 2006) and 2005-2006 when flows were <br />relatively low and water temperatures in summer were warm, and compare those trends with <br />abundance levels estimated from 1994-1996, a period prior to introduction or expansion of <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.