My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9555
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9555
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:28:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9555
Author
Bestgen, K. R., C. D. Walford, A. A. Hill and J. A. Hawkins.
Title
Native Fish Response to Removal of Non-native Predator Fish in the Yampa River, Colorado.
USFW Year
2007.
USFW - Doc Type
140,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(Graham and Orth 1987; Bestgen and Bundy 1998; Bundy and Bestgen 2001) Increment counts <br />were verified with a second reader. In general, otolith increments were obvio~s and easy to read. <br />smallmouth bass hatching dates were estimated by subtracting age in days frdm the date of <br />capture, assuming that the first daily increment was deposited at hatching. Pe~ the literature, a <br />1:1 relationship between age in days and otolith microincrement count was as~umed. Fish <br />growth rate was estimated by subtracting length at hatching (mean literature value of 5.5 mm TL, <br />Carlander 1977) from length at capture, and dividing by age in days. <br />Native fish evaluation data analysis.-Data analysis for this report <br />presentation of species richness and percent composition of fishes by control <br />and habitat type. We rely on this approach because that is the main data prey <br />for historical data, with which we make comparisons to our own data. We al <br />logistic regression analyses to estimate presence of native fishes as a function <br />sampling, control or treatment reach, habitat type (isolated pool or main char <br />smallmouth bass presence and abundance. We also conducted logistic regret <br />mostly via <br />treatment reach <br />technique <br />o conducted <br />of year of <br />iel), and <br />ion analyses to <br />estimate proportion of native fishes as a function of year of sampling, control or treatment reach, <br />habitat type (isolated pool or main channel), and smallmouth bass presence a <br />Overdispersion in these models was corrected by multiplying the standard er <br />parameter estimates by the square root of the deviance. This approach gives <br />larger estimates of the variance and generally results in fewer significant stal <br />estimates, so it is a conservative approach. Model selection was by AIC. A <br />conducted with Statistical Analysis Systems software, Proc Genmod and Prc <br />NC). <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br />Yampa River stream flow and water temperatures.-We present <br />historical and present-day streamflow and temperature patterns of the Y <br />believe they are a significant influence on recent changes in fish distribution <br />abundance. <br />of the <br />ire realistic and <br />cal tests for <br />ses were <br />GLM (SAS, Cary <br />ve information on <br />River because we <br />abundance <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.