Laserfiche WebLink
Position of American Fisheries Society on I~tred-aFtie~s-ef <br />£xet-ie Introduced' Aquatic Species <br />Our purpose is to formulate a broad mechanism for plan- <br />ning, regulating, implementing, and monitoring all intro- <br />ductions of e~cetie aquatic species. <br />Some introductions of species into ecosystems in which <br />they are not native have been successful (e.g., coho salmon <br />and striped bass) and others unfortunate (e.g., common carp <br />and walking catfish). <br />Species not native to an ecosystem will be termed ~- <br />etie-=' "introduced." Some introductions are in some sense, <br />planned and purposeful for management reasons; others <br />are accidental or are simply ways of disposing of unwanted <br />pets or research organisms. <br />It is recommended that the policy of the American Fish- <br />eries Society be: <br />1. Encourage exec-ie fish importers, farmers, dealers, and <br />hobbyists to prevent and discourage the accidental or pur- <br />posefulintroduction of e.,,~ aquatic s ecies into their local <br />ecosystems. <br />c ,. .. L: C: L a r L ,l• <br />}}-i.~r~,. aL„ ,,,,L t.l• L L c r >r a 1 >;• L n• <br />T'1nLdr1~ 1., e..,...t,.,. ~' 1'c a ~r~_, v _,_ >,r <br />b ~ <br />V 1 L aL C ,. L:.. [:,.L L. <br />..,... .......~ ..... LLL~J., <br />leeatpd;~assist a*9tie fish dealers, intp~e~rte~~, ete., i~ <br />..: L.~.. .. .. ti. J 1-: L LL <br />Aepa~tment regdlat3e~s Feirrt 3 I~~7 "^ ' L' ~ <br />..11.. ....L «L'C:,. <br />b J <br />2. Urge that no city, county, state, rovince, or federal <br />agency introduce, or allow to be introduced, any exetie spe- <br />cies into any waters within its jurisdiction which might con- <br />taminate any waters outside its jurisdiction without official <br />sanction of the exposed jurisdiction. <br />3. Urge that only ornamental aquarium Eish dealers be <br />permitted to import such fishes for sale or distribution to <br />hobbyists. The "dealer" would be defined as a firm or per- <br />son whose income derives from live ornamental aquarium <br />fishes. <br />4. Urge that the importation of e*eEie fishes for purposes <br />of research not involving introduction into a natural eco- <br />system, or for display in public aquaria by individuals or <br />organizations, be made under agreement with responsible <br />governmental agencies. Such importers will be subject to <br />'Words underlined are new. <br />investigatory procedures currently existing and/or to be de- <br />veloped, and species so imported shall be kept under con- <br />ditions preventing escape or accidental introduction. Aquar- <br />ium hobbyists should be encouraged to import rare <br />ornamental fishes through such importers. No fishes shall <br />be released into any natural ecosystem upon termination of <br />research or display. <br />5. Urge that all speciesof-e~t~~ considered for release <br />be prohibited and considered undesirable for any purposes <br />of introduction into any ecosystem unless that fish species <br />shall have been evaluated upon the following bases and <br />found to be desirable: <br />a. RATIONALE. Reasons for seeking an import should <br />be clearly stated and demonstrated. It should be clearly <br />noted what qualities are sought that would make the <br />import more desirable than native forms. <br />b. SEARCH. Within the qualifications set forth under RA- <br />TIONALE, asearch of possible contenders should be <br />made, with a list prepared of those that appear most <br />likely to succeed, and the favorable and unfavorable <br />aspects of each species noted. <br />c. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT. This <br />should go beyond the area of rationale to consider <br />impact vn target aquatic ecosystems, generally effect <br />on game and food fishes or waterfowl, on aquatic plants <br />and public health. The published information on the <br />species should be reviewed and the species should be <br />studied in preliminary fashion in its biotope. <br />d. PUBLICITY AND REVIEW. The subject should be en- <br />tirely open and expert advice should be sought. It is <br />at this point that thoroughness is in order. No impor- <br />tation is so urgent that it should not be subject to <br />careful evaluation. <br />e. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH. If a prospective import <br />passes the first four steps, a research program should <br />be initiated by an appropriate agency or organization <br />to test the import in confined waters (experimental <br />ponds, etc.). <br />f. EVALUATION OR RECOMMENDATION. Again <br />publicity is in order and complete reports should be <br />circulated amongst interested scientists and presented <br />for publication. <br />e~ie,-5eeic~. <br />g. INTRODUCTION. With favorable evaluation, the re- <br />lease should be effected and monitored, with results <br />published or circulated. <br />Because animals do not respect political boundaries, it <br />would seem that an international, national, and regional <br />agency should e:~ be involved at the start e~ and have <br />the veto power at the end. Under this procedure there is <br />no doubt that fewer exetie introductions would be accom- <br />plished, but quality and not quantity is desired and many <br />mistakes might be avoided. <br />B. The Society encourages international, national, and re- <br />gional natural resource agencies to endorse and follow the <br />intent of the above position. <br />C. The Society encourages international harmonization of <br />March -April 1986 41 <br />