Laserfiche WebLink
must occur. Likewise, several dozen studies have docu- <br />mented dietary overlap between introduced and native fishes <br />(see Taylor et al. 1984). However, these studies only dem- <br />onstrate that the potential for competition exists. Linking <br />dietary overlap to competition has proven to be a difficult <br />task for all but the most controlled ecological studies re- <br />gardless of whether non-native species are involved. <br />Documentation of predation by introduced species on na- <br />tive species serves as the most definitive example of impacts <br />on communities. The most frequently cited example in North <br />America concerns declines in populations of native trouts <br />attributable to brown trout predation (see Moyle 1976a,b; <br />Sharpe 1962; Alexander 1977, 1979). Several other intro- <br />duced fishes have been implicated as major causes of mor- <br />tality among native fishes, including pike killifish (Miley <br />1978; Turner 1981; Anderson 1981, 1982), oscar (Hogg 1976), <br />and the bairdiella (Quast 1961). Though frequently cited as <br />a potential threat of considerable consequence, predation <br />on eggs or young by introduced fishes has not been dem- <br />onstrated to be a common occurrence (Taylor et al. 1984). <br />Spatial Alteration <br />Concommittant overlap in usage of space by non-native <br />and native fishes may lead to competitive interaction if space <br />is in limited supply or of variable quality. Evidence exists <br />implicating displacement of brook trout by brown trout, but <br />in general, displacements are largely inferential (Taylor et <br />al. 1984). Conversely, high densities of introduced fishes <br />have been shown to exert negative effects on native fishes. <br />For example, Noble et al. (1975) observed that largemouth <br />bass populations in Trinidad Lake, Texas, declined with no <br />evidence of recruitment as densities of blue tilapia rose to <br />approximately 2,240 kg ha -' during the period 1972-1975. <br />Gene Pool Deterioration <br />Though reduction of heterogeneity through inbreeding is <br />clearly a threat to any species being produced'in a hatchery <br />(Philipp et al. 1983), the risk is most acute with species of <br />intercontinental origin because the initial broodstock invar- <br />iably represent limited gene pools at the outset. The larger <br />the stocking program, the more inbreeding among original <br />broodstock is necessary. Thus species introduced to a novel <br />habitat may or may not have the genetic characteristics nec- <br />essary for them to adapt and/or perform as predicted. <br />Fortunately, hybridization events among introduced and <br />native species in open waters are rare (Taylor et al. 1984). <br />Nevertheless, the possibility of native gene pools being al- <br />tered through such hybridization does exist. For example, <br />brown trout are known to hybridize with native forms in <br />North America (Schwartz 1972, 1981; Dangel et al. 1973; <br />Chevassus 1979). <br />Introduction of Diseases <br />Diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, and parasites are all <br />too often conveyed along with introduced aquatic species <br />(see Hoffman and Schubert 1984; Shotts and Gratzek 1984 <br />for reviews). This aspect represents one of the mast severe <br />threats that an introduced species may pose to a native <br />community. Transfer of diseased fish was no doubt respon- <br />sible for introduction of whirling disease into North America <br />Table 1. Organisms cited in text. <br />Common Name Scientific Name <br />Plants <br />hydrilla Hydrilla verticillata <br />water hyacinth Eichornia crassipes <br />Eurasian watermilfoil Myriophyl[um spicatum <br />alligator weed Alternanthera philoxeroides <br />Fish <br />Pacific salmon Oncorhyncus sp. <br />grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella <br />common carp Cyprinus carpio <br />tilapias Oreochromis, Sarotherodon <br /> and Tilapia sp. <br />blue tilapia Oreochromis aureus <br /> (= Tilapia aurea) <br />redbelly tilapia Tilapia zil[i <br />brown trout Salmo trutta <br />pike killifish Belonesox belizanus <br />oscar Astronotus ocellatus <br />bairdiella Bairdiella icistia <br />brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis <br />largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides <br />coho salmon Oncorhyncus kisutch <br />striped bass Morone saxatilis <br />walking catfish Clarias batrachus <br />Other <br />whirling disease Myxosoma cerebralis <br />"ich" Ichthyopthirius multifiliis <br />from Europe. Recently, infectious hypodermal and hema- <br />topoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV) has been spread to a num- <br />ber of countries in conjunction with shipments of live pen- <br />aeid shrimp. IHHNV was first diagnosed in 1981 at shrimp <br />culture facilities in Hawaii among shrimp introduced from <br />Panama (Sindermann 1986). Even "ich," one of the most <br />common fish diseases worldwide, caused by a ciliated pro- <br />tozoan, is thought to have been transferred from Asia <br />throughout the temperate zone with shipments of fishes <br />(Hoffman 1970, 1981). <br />C. Courses of Action <br />Introductions of species to aquatic communities are com- <br />monly employed as a fisheries management tool or occur as <br />a result of escapes from aquaculture or ornamental fish hold- <br />ing facilities. It is not feasible, nor desirable, to legislate <br />against all such introductions. What is needed is more ed- <br />ucation on the role that introduced species can and should <br />play in the context of aquatic resources management. The <br />more informed natural resources managers are about such <br />issues, the less likely that mistakes will be made or that <br />legislation will be necessary to enforce an "attitude of cau- <br />tion." The following actions toward that end are recom- <br />mended. <br />A. The membership reaffirms its endorsement of the 1972 <br />"Position of the American Fisheries Society on Introductions <br />of Exotic Aquatic Species" with modifications as indicated: <br />40 Fisheries, Vol. 11, No. 2 <br />