Laserfiche WebLink
293 <br /> <br />~ 40 <br />E <br />L <br />~ 35 <br />C <br />Q 30 <br />C <br />25 <br />^ Green River i980 ^ <br />• Colorado River <br />1982 <br />r2 = .91 <br />1982 <br />• ^ 1983 <br />1983 1984 <br />• <br />1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 <br />Suitability index <br />Fig. 4. Relation between the mean total length of age-0 Col- <br />orado squawfish infall in the Green and Colorado rivers and the <br />relative availability of temperatures suitable for growth (suit- <br />ability index) for the year of capture. Year of data collection is <br />given. <br />theoretical populations is much greater than in pre- <br />sent-day, upper-basin Colorado squawfish. Be- <br />cause that population is at best stable and perhaps <br />declining (Holden & Wick 1982, Tyus et al. 1982), <br />its net reproductive rate (R°, the number of mature <br />female offspring produced in the lifetime of a fe- <br />male parent) is no more than 1 - a condition far <br />worse than that shown even by our simulated slow- <br />a~ <br />N <br />.~ <br />+` <br />O <br />.~ <br />0 <br />,z <br />«I <br />E <br />m <br />LL <br />"Fast" <br />(95% per <br />year, <br />early-life <br />mortality) "Fast" <br /> (99% per <br /> year, <br /> early-life <br /> mortality) <br /> "Slow" <br /> (95% per year, <br /> early-life mortality) <br /> "Slow" <br /> (99°h per year, <br /> early-life mortality) <br />Time <br />Fig. 5. Comparison of theoretical growth of populations of <br />fast-growing, early-maturing female Colorado squawfish (`fast') <br />with those of slow-growing, late-maturing Ctsh (`slow'), in a <br />limitless environment, under conditions of 95 or 99% early-life <br />mortality. <br />growing population when early-life mortality is <br />99% (Appendix). Although the sustained, geomet- <br />ric growth indicated by our simulations (Fig. 5) <br />does not occur in nature, the slopes of these curves <br />provide an indication of the relative capacity of the <br />Table 1. Estimated survival (number of fish) in simulated populations of 1000 female Colorado squawfish that grow at different rates <br />(S = slow; F =fast) and are subjected to different annual mortalities (80-99%) while at total lengths of 10-110 mm and to equal annual <br />mortalities of 20% while in each of three longer length classes.e <br />Total length Time in <br />(mm) length class <br />(years) <br />S F <br />Assumed annual mortality of first length class, and growth-rate category <br />80% <br />S F <br />90% <br />S F <br />95% <br />S F <br />10-110 1.9 1.0 56 200 19 100 7.3 SO <br />111-210 1.1 0.25 44 190 15 95 5.7 48 <br />211-310 1.2 0.5 34 171 11 85 4.4 43 <br />311-410 1.8 1.25 23 130 8 65 3.0 32 <br />Production <br />of mature <br />fematesb - - - 466 - 712 - 967 <br />99% <br />S F <br />1.1 10 <br />0.9 9.5 <br />0.7 8.6 <br />0.5 6.5 <br />1200 <br />e Initial population of 1000 female larvae 10 mm long were accepted as being the offspring of one mature female <br />"Percentage by which fast-growing fish exceed slow-growing fish in producing mature females 410 mm long. <br />