Laserfiche WebLink
292 <br />30 <br />~U <br />.c °.~ <br />c ~ 20 <br />O ~ <br />~ ~ <br />~ Q 10 <br />~ ~ <br />~r~• <br />Spawning ~ ~ Middle (3.9} <br />....................... ...y ... ........ • ........... <br />Growth •~.~'% (2.1)~ •`• <br />..\.; . <br />• /,~ • <br />/ ~•~ ~\• <br />:•• Green (3.2) • • <br />.• <br />J F M A M J J A S O N D <br />Month <br />Fig. 3. Comparison of temperature regimes (average mean-monthly temperatures) of the historic lower and middle Colorado River and <br />of the present upper Colorado and Green rivers. Horizontal lines are temperature thresholds for growth (13° C) and the onset of <br />spawning (2()° C) of Colorado squawfish. Numbers in parentheses are the relative availability of temperatures suitable for Colorado <br />squawfish growth provided by each temperature regime (see text for explanation). See Figure 1 for sites oftemperature-data collection. <br />Age-0 growth analysis <br />'There was a highly significant, positive relation <br />(p<0.01, r = 0.95) between the mean total length <br />of age-0 Colorado squawfish captured in fall from <br />the Green and Colorado rivers and the relative <br />suitability of the temperature regime for the year of <br />capture (Fig. 4). The coefficient of determination <br />(r2 = 0.91) indicated 91% of the variation in fish <br />length was explained by variation in the suitability <br />index. <br />Age-0 Colorado squawfish are most often cap- <br />tured from river backwaters (Holden & Stalnaker <br />1975). Although the temperature regimes of both <br />backwater and main-channel habitats are largely <br />dependent upon ambient air temperature and solar <br />radiation and therefore are closely correlated with <br />one another, backwaters generally have larger diel <br />temperature variation than does the main channel <br />(Robert Green, personal communication). Colora- <br />do squawfish might make Biel movements between <br />backwater and main-channel habitats to maximize <br />the use of temperatures near their physiological <br />optimum (e.g. Magnuson et al. 1979). The impor- <br />tance of such behavioral thermal regulation to the <br />relation shown in Figure 4, which isbased onmain- <br />channel temperatures, is unknown. <br />Population simulation <br />As one would expect, our simulations showed that <br />fewer fish reach maturity as early-life mortality <br />increases; more important, however, they showed <br />that growth rate can have a pronounced effect on <br />survival (Table 1). Markedly more fast-growing <br />fish than slow-growing ones reach maturity at each <br />rate of early-life mortality, and this disparity in- <br />creases asearly-life mortality increases. The poten- <br />tialeffect of increased early-life mortality is there- <br />fore much greater in populations of slow-growing <br />fish than in those of fast-growing fish. <br />The combined effect of low survival to maturity <br />and advanced age at first maturity is reduced po- <br />tential for population growth (Cole 1954), as pre- <br />dicted by our simulations (Fig. 5). Moreover, we <br />illustrated in Figure 5 that growth potential of the <br />populations of fast-growing fish is markedly grea- <br />ter than that of the slow-growing ones, especially <br />when early-life mortality is 99%. Computation of <br />vital statistics for our simulated populations is ex- <br />emplified in the Appendix. <br />Although our simulations are useful for showing <br />the importance of growth rate of individual fish as it <br />can affect potential for population growth, they <br />also provide examples in which the growth of the <br />