Laserfiche WebLink
78 COMPONENTS OF THE FEDERAL ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM <br />bright chattering flocks of parakeets, committed men and <br />women were using that tragedy to generate support for increas- <br />ing efforts to stem the tide of extinctions that appeared ready to <br />engulf America's prominent wildlife species. <br />During that era there were no official lists of endangered wild- <br />life. Afew books and magazine articles presented terse descrip- <br />tions of vanished species and listed those deemed likely to follow <br />the pigeon and several other members of our wildlife heritage to <br />the abyss of extinction. (See, for example, Hornaday, 1913.) <br />THE OFFICIAL LISTS <br />When the first Endangered Species Act (ESA) was passed in <br />1966,' the secretary of the interior was directed, after consulta- <br />tion with affected states and scientific groups having expertise <br />in the matter, to "publish in the Federal Register the names of <br />the species of native fish- and wildlife found to be threatened <br />with extinction." This congressional directive to create the first <br />official U.S. endangered species list postdated the July 1966 Red <br />Data Book, published by the International Union for the Conser- <br />vation ofNature, containing lists of rare and endangered species <br />around the world. Significantly, when the first ESA passed, the <br />expressed intent was to protect thirty-five or so species of native <br />mammals and thirty to forty species of native birds believed to <br />be near extinction (Congressional Quarterly Almanac, 1966). <br />Through the 1969 Endangered Species Protection Act,? Con- <br />gress institutionalized the global scope of the listing process by <br />authorizing the interior secretary to list wildlife "threatened <br />with worldwide extinction" and to prohibit the importation of <br />such species into the United States except under specified condi- <br />tions. The decision to list a species required consultation with <br />the states that might be affected and, in the case of foreign <br />species, with the nations where the species is normally found. In <br />contrast to the earlier, somewhat informal process for listing, <br />the 1969 act intended that listing decisions comply with the <br />Administrative Procedures Act (Bean, 1983, p. 323). <br />With the enactment of Public Law 93-205 on December 28, <br />1973, and subsequent amendments, the ESA became the most <br />far-reaching wildlife statute ever adopted by any nation. Under <br />